• Please note that this section is for questions regarding the forum itself - it is not for fan game-related questions. If you have a question about a fan game, ask in the appropriate thread.

  • Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • It's time to vote for your favorite Pokémon Battle Revolution protagonist in our new weekly protagonist poll! Click here to cast your vote and let us know which PBR protagonist you like most.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Question: Active members per week

Thirding this. I think it'd be more accurate to show a week than a month. Just seems better.
 
I would agree but I think 2 weeks would be slightly more accurate.

I mean the way I see it, if someone logs on once every 8 days then I would consider them an "active" member of PC, although on the fringe edge of active they can still keep up with PC. But 2 weeks mean to be considered inactive you have to log on less than twice a month (once every 15 days), which definitely is inactive to me. Idk I would like it changed too but 1 week seems like it'll leave out people that are active on here in that they post but they might love a slow section so logging on once every 8-9 days would be fine for them, lol.
 
It's more about seeing how many members log on per week, it has no real reflection on the members' activity.

I think this would be cool, 2 months seems like a pretty long period of time. However I'm unsure what constraints this would have on the server to have to check how many people logged on each week as opposed to bi-monthly.
 
While this would be much more accurate, having to check the number of members that have logged in the past week, EVERY week might be stressful on the server. Idk, just a guess. Just don't wanna see Stunfisk outside of the Stunfisk'd forum style.
 
I'd be a bit surprised if that is the case because either way it still has to keep a count of how many people logged on; all that changes is how often that number is displayed.

I think a week makes more sense than two months imo - besides you get more of a sense on how active the forum has been in a week than in two months when a period of inactivity may not be obvious if the number is over a long period anyways. Dividing by 8 or so doesn't mean that it's been that number consistently every week after all. *shrug* Then again I'm not really fussed over those stats anyways.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top