I'm pretty sure it's (somehow) been mathematically proven that there has to be life out there in the universe.
Intelligent life, I'm not so sure on... but it probably does exist.
That's the Drake Equation. It doesn't
prove the existence of alien life per se, but is more like an estimate of how the potential number of alien
civilisations (not just sentient animals but actually sapient) in the Milky Way.
According to Wikipedia it is: N= R* x f
p x n
e x f
e x f
i x f
c x L
I think we haven't found life because we're looking for it under Earth's standards. Obviously, if life developed on another planet, it won't be under Earth's standards. It'll be under that planet's standards. That, I think, will make it really hard for us to find life if it doesn't walk up to us with a ray gun or something.
Obviously life on other planets will
completely different to terrestrial life, but at this stage due to the fact we have no real frame of reference as to what, if any habitats are most likely to be habitable by aliens, all we can really do is look for planets similar to Earth, with plenty of liquid water and an Oxygen rich atmosphere. Besides, while we are still earthbound we can only really look for planets with the possibility of housing life similar to ours. We will only ever find proper proof for the existence of extra-terrestrials if we either actively seek them out in space or they present themselves to us.
I agree with what many here say. If we saw alien life, depending on the conditions it has evolved under, we might look straight past it without even noticing. Why says it must be organic? Who says it must be carbon-based? Who says it needs to be built up of physical matter, or even be visible to our visual spectrum? Who says it is even confined to just this dimension, or has to have originated in this dimension? There are so many possibilities. Many, many worlds that may have their own unique way for life to live.
I agree with most of what you say, but I'm having trouble what you mean by in-organic life. Do you mean life made up of say, minerals like metal or rock?
Although, depending on who finds who, it could be problamatic for us. It is human nature, and i belive to be every inteligent beings nature, war and conflict advance civilization fastest. Look at how far planes came from the begining of WWI to the end of WWII, or how the cold war brought us to space. IMO any advanced civilization would be a violent civilzation. Ive never seen the hippies planning a space mission, but we seem to think, or mabye just hope, that this is how other civilzations will be. No advanced civilization would come in peace. only to conquer.
I disagree. We only evolved as a militaristic species because that was what suited our evolutionary path. We needed to compete for food and territory with both ourselves and our now extinct relatives such as the Neanderthals. We simply kept on fighting because that is how we are programmed to survive.
There may be other species out there who have no concept of war. The most likely candidates would be (the equivalent of) a herbivorous civilisation. They would not have needed to evolve a way of killing their prey, as they had no need to. Humanity only invented weapons as a way of killing our prey more efficiently, another species may have started out by making tools to retrieve food from alien flora.