• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Best and worst books?

EarthWolfblade

Returning breeder
234
Posts
12
Years
    • Seen Jul 19, 2013
    Of the different book series that were super huge,
    Lord of the Rings
    Harry Potter
    Twilight
    Hunger Games

    In your opinion, which was best and which was worst?

    And yes I know I spelled worst wrong in the topic
     
    Last edited:

    Demon.

    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain
    270
    Posts
    12
    Years
    • Seen Jun 20, 2018
    Lord of the Rings
    Harry Potter
    Hunger Games
    Everything else that was huge
    Twilight


    In that order from best to worst.
     
    10,769
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • I haven't read Twilight, but I've read lots of quotes and parts and it's pretty bad, but I'm only seeing the worst of it. Lord of the Rings I found a little slow and draggy at times - basically kinda slow, but otherwise not bad. Harry Potter books were fine. Nothing fantastic from a literary perspective, but entertaining. The Hunger Games were... well, I can't say I didn't read the first one quickly, but like HP and LotR they petered out by the end.

    I suppose I'd go LotR > HP > HG > Twi.
     

    Logan

    [img]http://pldh.net/media/pokecons_action/403.gif
    10,417
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • I've only actually read the Harry Potter books, I've watched some of the films of the others but I haven't read the books. n_n
     

    Cherrim

    PSA: Blossom Shower theme is BACK ♥
    33,291
    Posts
    21
    Years
  • Disclaimer: I haven't read all of Twilight. I could only suffer through about a third of it before it was too much for me to take. My roommate, however, had to read it for a university course and insisted on reading it aloud in my bedroom most of the time so it's practically like I've read the whole thing anyway. I've read all the others listed though so...

    Personally?
    Harry Potter > Hunger Games > LotR > Twilight
    Trying to look at it objectively?
    LotR = Harry Potter > Hunger Games > Twilight

    I feel kind of bad not putting LotR first when I KNOW it's such an influential series and so much of the fantasy (and even scifi) genre wouldn't be the same without it but... it's so dry! The execution of those books is horrible, at least for me. I read them once and will never read them again because I hated them so much. I liked the idea, I liked the premise, the characters, the plot... but the books were so dry and boring that it was a major chore to get through them.

    Harry Potter may not be as genre defining as LotR was but the world felt just as fleshed out--if not more--to me. There was so much detail, the plots were intriguing, the characters were witty and likeable. The pacing wasn't so great in the middle when Rowling wasn't using/allowing an editor (or something like that, I'd heard?) but generally each book really pulled you in and had the right amount of suspense to keep you going until you were done. I actually look forward to reading them every few years and I still find myself fully delighted with the world created in the series. It may not be a literary masterpiece but from an entertainment perspective, which is why I read fiction in the first place, it's excellent.

    ...Hunger Games is entertaining but it's just Battle Royale with more politics and less violence. It also got really silly as the series went on so while I immensely enjoyed the first one, by the third one I was convinced I was reading a really bad fanfic and I'd been served the wrong ebook.

    Twilight was awful and I assume its sequels were awful. It does bring me great joy in the form of Robert Pattinson's commentary on the movie adaptation's DVDs. Seriously, those are hilarious.
     

    Lord Varion

    Guess who's back?
    2,642
    Posts
    15
    Years
    • Age 29
    • Seen Jan 6, 2015
    My opinion was the 'Charlie Bone' series.

    I still read em to this day.
     

    Lozz

    meow meow meow <3
    144
    Posts
    12
    Years
  • 1. Harry Potter

    2. LOTR

    3. Hunger Games

    4. Everything else ever written in the entire world, including an illiterate child's first attempt at learning the alphabet.

    5. Twilight.

    6. 50 Shades of Grey and any other twilight fanfictions that get picked up/turned into softcore porn for 40+ sexually repressed conservative women.
     
    10,769
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • Ah, I knew there was another book series out there that I couldn't remember. 50 Shades of Grey! Not something I've read in its entirety, but I've read excerpts and it's as badly written as Twilight. Perhaps worse since it is just Twilight fanfic. Bad writing aside, it has an awful message. Twilight is just wish fulfillment compared to it.
     
    30,928
    Posts
    20
    Years
    • Seen Apr 2, 2023
    Harry Potter > LotR > Hunger Games > Twilight

    The only series I haven't read in its entirety was Twilight, I think I got maybe halfway into New Moon before just putting it down and never coming back to it. I guess I can't offer a very informed critique on Twilight, but I would imagine that the books getting worse and worse to the point where I just gave up is testimony to how I felt about them. I will give it this, it's better than the insane number of copycats spawned from its genre in the wake of its popularity.

    Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are definitely my favorites. One series might have traits about it that like while the other might do those traits in a less impressive manner. Lord of the Rings definitely gets dry from time to time and I feel like each book is less impressive than the previous. Even though it isn't technically part of the series, I loved The Hobbit, it was this great sort of old timey adventure story that I feel outshines a lot of its modern counterparts. Fellowship of the Ring was good, but this is when the books really started just sort of muddling about and taking forever to do anything. I managed to finish the series, but I honestly wasn't super enthralled with with Two Towers and Return of the King as I was with The Hobbit. (and Fellowship, to a lesser extent) I can see myself rereading Fellowship of the Ring from the series proper sometime in the future, but I don't think I would ever want to tackle the second and third books ever again.

    I put Harry Potter first because I enjoyed every book in the series, some more than others, and I was never truly bored with the series. There's a huge cast of characters to know and because they are written from a modern mindset, I think it's easier to connect to them now than characters from an older series. At least on a superficial level. Harry Potter is the series that got me into reading and so it's always going to have a special place with me, but I do think it's a genuinely good series. Solid characters, exciting stories and I've always loved the world setting created in that series. These are books I reread quite often, even the heftier ones that could use some trimming.

    The Hunger Games are...decent. I thought the first book was okay, really liked Catching Fire, and just sort of didn't care about anything happening in Mockingjay. The final book has the problem I think the Return of the King and Two Towers had: it takes too long to get anything done. Nearly the first half of the book is Katniss being stripped of everything that made her such a powerful character and we're left with this...emotionally numb thing that I just don't care about. And for all its buildup, the ending was pretty lackluster. Both the epilogue and the end of the war.
    My roommate, however, had to read it for a university course
    There...are courses the require Twilight readings? Oh my.
     

    EarthWolfblade

    Returning breeder
    234
    Posts
    12
    Years
    • Seen Jul 19, 2013
    It's hard to decide for me whether HP or LOTR for #1...They're basically the same thing, with LOTR being a bit bigger plot-wise. If it was the movies I'd say LOTR hands down but the LOTR books were a bit dry at times. HP was easier to read and even though it had ridiculously long books(760 pages? Really?) I still thought they were better entertaining. LOTR is definitely the better literature but from entertainment point(Which is why I read books), HP wins. Hunger Games was eh...decent. I enjoyed the first one, though I still think it's kinda overrated. The second one was just terrible, and the third one was um, alright. It took way to long to get to the point then once it did it skipped way too fast(With the end of the war and Snow's execution). Twilight...I never read it other than certain sections and it was just god awful.
    So:
    1. Harry Potter
    2. Lord of The Rings
    3. Hunger Games
    4. Any other book ever possibly created
    5. Twilight
     
    6,306
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Best books are all the Harry Potter books. Next would be all the Hunger Games books!

    Worst? Yeah, Twilight. All of them.
     

    Bounsweet

    Fruit Pokémon
    2,103
    Posts
    16
    Years
    • Seen Sep 17, 2018
    Best to worst, in order:

    Harry Potter/Lord of the Rings
    The Hunger Games
    Twilight
     

    Arcturus.

    Chews nails and spits napalm
    605
    Posts
    11
    Years
  • I actually haven't read the Harry Potter or LotR books, mostly because I can't get into magic and fantasy stuff. I have read the Hunger Games and I enjoyed the first two, but I didn't really enjoy Mockingjay as much. I think if I ever touched a Twilight book, it would burn. So my list would go like this.

    Hunger Games>Harry Potter>LotR>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Twilight
     

    Hannah

    beep bop boop
    1,150
    Posts
    11
    Years
    • Age 23
    • Seen Nov 16, 2021
    Best? Harry Potter, hands down. The books are absolutely perfect, but the movies could be better. Next would be the Hunger Games, because Peeta just makes me go fan-girl. After that would be the Lord of the Rings. Even though I haven't watched or read it yet, I know that it's way better than Twilight. Who's ever heard of vampires that glitter?

    So Harry Potter > Hunger Games > Lord of the Rings > Twilight.
     

    Altomare

    Purupuru!
    114
    Posts
    11
    Years
  • The only one that I have read is Harry Potter, and I'm impressed that each of the books managed to be exciting, have many subplots yet they all become connected in the final book.
     
    Back
    Top