- 2,138
- Posts
- 12
- Years
- The States
- Seen Nov 6, 2016
Many people live in areas where gardening isn't an option. Plus, how many hours of gardening does it take to yield similar results to high weight training? How does gardening contribute to the world, it's a high time investment, time that could focus into making a real contribution in a career. Unless, we are talking vegetable garden, but most people don't have the time, money, knowledge, or resources to garden. Additionally, it's not the same work out, it's more effort and time with less building of lean muscle comparatively.
Chopping wood won't maximize strength holistically, and is a high rep, high time investment, and access to wood. Most people don't have personal use for it, not to mention, one would have to own some sort of foresty or purchase the wood. It's not feasible for most to purchase wood, chop it, and then have no use for it. It would be a waste of resources and time in comparison to working out for a few hours a week.
I would never move a tree for a workout since that doesn't seem very reliable since I would have to actively seek out tree to do an easy hour long workout. Again, professionals would take care of a tree if obstructing a road. Additionally, it's not efficient for gaining lean mass over time.
Most don't have the time or expertise to build things, let professionals with careers in their respective fields build and market products. Most certainly can't do that and along with other responsibilities that they perform to contribute to society with the resources available.
Ultimately, being healthy in of itself is a contribution to society. It shouldn't require expertise, reliance on others, and unnecessary time investment to stay healthy. Doing so is a waste of time and resources for professionals and groups that already provide those services more efficiently.
Sure, we can help a friend move, lift things for them, help in their garden ect. But those opportunities are few and far between, and consume a lot of time! I don't think it's feasible to expect someone to invest so much time to yield less results for their health.
Though I would agree a person that does intensive labor as a career could be performing redundant workouts, I wouldn't make that assumption about other people that lift as a means for staying in-shape.
Chopping wood won't maximize strength holistically, and is a high rep, high time investment, and access to wood. Most people don't have personal use for it, not to mention, one would have to own some sort of foresty or purchase the wood. It's not feasible for most to purchase wood, chop it, and then have no use for it. It would be a waste of resources and time in comparison to working out for a few hours a week.
I would never move a tree for a workout since that doesn't seem very reliable since I would have to actively seek out tree to do an easy hour long workout. Again, professionals would take care of a tree if obstructing a road. Additionally, it's not efficient for gaining lean mass over time.
Most don't have the time or expertise to build things, let professionals with careers in their respective fields build and market products. Most certainly can't do that and along with other responsibilities that they perform to contribute to society with the resources available.
Ultimately, being healthy in of itself is a contribution to society. It shouldn't require expertise, reliance on others, and unnecessary time investment to stay healthy. Doing so is a waste of time and resources for professionals and groups that already provide those services more efficiently.
Sure, we can help a friend move, lift things for them, help in their garden ect. But those opportunities are few and far between, and consume a lot of time! I don't think it's feasible to expect someone to invest so much time to yield less results for their health.
Though I would agree a person that does intensive labor as a career could be performing redundant workouts, I wouldn't make that assumption about other people that lift as a means for staying in-shape.