So... you're going to scum read me because I got things from two games mixed up and then openly admitted I psyducked up. Are you sure you aren't mafia? Like, your reasoning and also how you phrased are awful. I haven't made a single good point this phase because everything I thought was a mess lmao. This is the first good point I've had. It's not like I made sense then did a 180 for no reason.
Sorry that the phrasing is weird. I'm kinda sleepy rn as it's close to midnight, so bear with the message I suppose. I'll make a more clear explanation here.
But yeah, I'm scumreading you for your weirdly different behavior this whole phase.
Let's see, you started this phase accusing Sparkin with a one-liner. Initially, it felt like you had the same ideas as Rabi, but I feel that that was a planned ploy to get Sparkin lynched from the start.
Later on, you made a post accusing Sparkin of defending obvious mafia from the start. It
was sensible to me, though I initially thought you just reversed the names.
But it turns out you were actually 'mistaken'.
I think that you could have planned that as mafia to use that accusation to lynch Sparkin. Turns out, you didn't actually have evidence to back yourself up, so you just wrenched it down to a 'mistake' to make you look innocent.
Then easily moved votes to seemingly reduce suspicion.
I'm keeping my vote on you for now.
Crazy theory and weird phrasing I know, but try to understand it, I guess.
I need to sleep, so if you need me, just ping me.
