Warrior Rapter
Dinosaur Pokemon Trainer
- 209
- Posts
- 16
- Years
- Oklahoma
- Seen Jul 25, 2017
I'm sure most of us know what strategies are, whether it be in a game, on a board, hidden within cards, or something we use in our lives as a plan for the future. But how do you define it?
For me personally, do to much of my experience concerning different types of strategies having come from playing some type of game, it's that experience that I draw on for the this question when I say that I feel like strategy could be defined as an art - the art even - of being lucky more frequently, and I know that can be a little controversial, considering many people view strategies as skill based, but are they really?
Admittedly, experience can play a good portion as well. If you are in a position in a game where you are seeing others just use a similar strategy over and over, the next time you play you are going to expect it, right? But, at the same time, I feel like there are some people who misjudge how much like they could actually be using. Card games in particular are a good example, where the start of the strategy for it lies with what is in the deck. Odds in your favor of getting the card you are needing or not, you are still playing with luck. I feel like the same could be said with judging your opponent, too. You can plan for a strategy that you're expecting to see, you can play the odds in your favor if that's what they are actually doing, and like with the cards, the odds of seeing something different are just as likely as not getting a certain card.
What happens in the chance that you are unlucky once? You may try a move that shows your opponent that you are not out of the game yet, slowing them down via a more defensive play or a quick hit at a vulnerability, the end result the same: buying time. Divert their focus just long enough for you to improve your odds. Of you getting a luckier outcome.
What are your guys thoughts?
For me personally, do to much of my experience concerning different types of strategies having come from playing some type of game, it's that experience that I draw on for the this question when I say that I feel like strategy could be defined as an art - the art even - of being lucky more frequently, and I know that can be a little controversial, considering many people view strategies as skill based, but are they really?
Admittedly, experience can play a good portion as well. If you are in a position in a game where you are seeing others just use a similar strategy over and over, the next time you play you are going to expect it, right? But, at the same time, I feel like there are some people who misjudge how much like they could actually be using. Card games in particular are a good example, where the start of the strategy for it lies with what is in the deck. Odds in your favor of getting the card you are needing or not, you are still playing with luck. I feel like the same could be said with judging your opponent, too. You can plan for a strategy that you're expecting to see, you can play the odds in your favor if that's what they are actually doing, and like with the cards, the odds of seeing something different are just as likely as not getting a certain card.
What happens in the chance that you are unlucky once? You may try a move that shows your opponent that you are not out of the game yet, slowing them down via a more defensive play or a quick hit at a vulnerability, the end result the same: buying time. Divert their focus just long enough for you to improve your odds. Of you getting a luckier outcome.
What are your guys thoughts?