- 30,930
- Posts
- 21
- Years
- Seen Jun 17, 2024
I don't think the violence not being shown in the most visible light had too great of an impact on the book to film transition, there were just different techniques employed to give that feeling of chaos. I mean, yeah, it helps to punctuate the idea of brutality, but showing it outright isn't the only way to do this. As far as book to movie transitions go, The Hunger Games was pretty spot on, the few things that weren't in the movie don't have the greatest importance in Catching Fire or MockingJay, so it's not like they shot themselves in the foot there. I had high hopes going into it just because you already had Collins writing the screenplay, so she wouldn't deliver anything too radically different.
Well isn't the issue here that the movie and book had a freakishly close production overlap? Like, I think it was said that Spielberg actually started early pre production before the book was even finished. Then there's Crichton supposedly believing that a lot of the book couldn't even be adapted properly, so we has fine with the changes from the get go even if it lead to a radically different piece of work.I love Jurassic Park the book. The movie skips a lot of stuff. The ending is totally different. It's not so much of a cautionary tale. But... it is a damn good popcorn flick. I like it. It's fun. I'd love a serious adaptation truer to the book as well, but it doesn't make the A+ B-movie version bad.