- 178
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- Malaysia
- Seen Mar 24, 2012
hitmonchan for me...bcause she can learn thunder,fire,ice,drain punch.....:)
hitmonchan for me...bcause [S-HIGHLIGHT]she[/S-HIGHLIGHT] can learn thunder,fire,ice,drain punch.....:)
I'm going to go with the classics here. The Hitmon-Pokes for me. At least they don't look like colored rocks.
Actually. Nageki and Dageki are suppose to represent Judo and Karate, respectivly.
Indeed - I believe the identification for them in the dex literally translates to the Karate/Judo Pokemon as well. Their general sprite stances fits that too, as do their movesets - judo focus on grappling and take downs/throws - Nageki gets moves like Bind, Vital Throw and Overhead Throw, while karate does not - more about fighting on one's feet and using hand/leg attacks rather than grabbing, hence Dageki getting moves like Rock Smash, Brick Break, Ankle Sweep, and the obvious Karate Chop.
Certainly there's more to them than what meets the eye at first glance.
Based on designs alone, the chans are far superior. Plus, it's the Pokemon version of Bruce Lee and Jakie Chan! How could you vote against that?
I like the Hitmons better, Nageki and Dageki look like Bert and Ernie
![]()
Such posts do deserve the question - what is a Pokemon? The answer is...well, what the creators of Pokemon decide they should look like, really - there's no real specific 'look' that Pokemon have as ever since the beginning they've had all sorts of shapes and different origins, etc. Sure some gens have different general themes of sorts but that doesn't make them any more or less of a 'Pokemon'.The new ones don't even look like pokemon!! I mean really?! since when did the designs have to be complicated?!