Cherrim
PSA: Blossom Shower theme is BACK ♥
- 33,494
- Posts
- 22
- Years
- Age 36
- she / her
- Toronto
- Seen yesterday
Isn't the average gamer age something like 30 nowadays anyway? :( I could probably grab some stats/articles on this but I'm at work and don't care enough anyway. Point is, there is no proof aside from your own opinion that games are for children.
I won't argue that some of the greatest games were made more with children in mind than anyone else. But I think what made those games so great (I'm thinking Pokémon, Mario games... okay, most Nintendo IPs) is that you didn't have to be a child to appreciate them. A child (7~12 is my definition) could have just as much fun as an adult could. Those games are often rated E for everyone--not just kids. :/
I think the problem nowadays is that kids aren't a very interesting market for the gaming industry. Yeah, their parents will buy them video games but the parents make the final decision and aside from time-tested favourites like Pokémon and Mario... what are they supposed to choose? Any video game is just a video game, right? So they pull the shovelware off the shelf and bring that home. And the kid (arguably) doesn't care--it's still a brand new Wii or DS game.
But the more intelligent consumers? The ones who actually care about the games they're playing and how their money is spent? Those are the "core" gamers that every company is trying to impress nowadays. And since an interesting game seems to be synonymous with dark, mature, dreary, shooters these days... well. :( That's what we get. Yeah, some of these games are genuinely good and a lot of the "great" games we look forward to these days are geared toward teens at the very least. Video games aren't all for kids, and they aren't all for adults. Different games target different demographics.
Video games aren't just toys anymore... I'm not here to argue that they're an art form, but they're definitely a medium of entertainment... and go ahead and look at other media. Not all TV shows (or even cartoons, a medium formerly hailed as kids-only) are geared toward the same groups. Spongebob is a cartoon and it's definitely a kids show, whereas I probably wouldn't want my young kids watching South Park which is another cartoon/show. In cinema, it's the same. You can go to a theatre and see a kids movie, or you can see an R-rated films for adults, or you could hit up a PG film with the whole family. Same with books, comic books, music, and any other form of entertainment you can think of.
To say a video game isn't a video game unless it's geared solely toward kids is as ignorant as saying a cartoon isn't a cartoon unless it's geared solely toward kids. It may be your opinion that the genre is childish and should remain that way but clearly the industry disagrees. I definitely agree that more games should be playable by all ages and I'm getting a bit sick of the "LET'S MAKE ALL OUR GAMES RATED M TO KEEP PEOPLE INTERESTED" thing that's been going on the last few years, but if a game genuinely fits into its M-rating and is a good, fun game... I'm not gonna complain too much. :/
I won't argue that some of the greatest games were made more with children in mind than anyone else. But I think what made those games so great (I'm thinking Pokémon, Mario games... okay, most Nintendo IPs) is that you didn't have to be a child to appreciate them. A child (7~12 is my definition) could have just as much fun as an adult could. Those games are often rated E for everyone--not just kids. :/
I think the problem nowadays is that kids aren't a very interesting market for the gaming industry. Yeah, their parents will buy them video games but the parents make the final decision and aside from time-tested favourites like Pokémon and Mario... what are they supposed to choose? Any video game is just a video game, right? So they pull the shovelware off the shelf and bring that home. And the kid (arguably) doesn't care--it's still a brand new Wii or DS game.
But the more intelligent consumers? The ones who actually care about the games they're playing and how their money is spent? Those are the "core" gamers that every company is trying to impress nowadays. And since an interesting game seems to be synonymous with dark, mature, dreary, shooters these days... well. :( That's what we get. Yeah, some of these games are genuinely good and a lot of the "great" games we look forward to these days are geared toward teens at the very least. Video games aren't all for kids, and they aren't all for adults. Different games target different demographics.
Video games aren't just toys anymore... I'm not here to argue that they're an art form, but they're definitely a medium of entertainment... and go ahead and look at other media. Not all TV shows (or even cartoons, a medium formerly hailed as kids-only) are geared toward the same groups. Spongebob is a cartoon and it's definitely a kids show, whereas I probably wouldn't want my young kids watching South Park which is another cartoon/show. In cinema, it's the same. You can go to a theatre and see a kids movie, or you can see an R-rated films for adults, or you could hit up a PG film with the whole family. Same with books, comic books, music, and any other form of entertainment you can think of.
To say a video game isn't a video game unless it's geared solely toward kids is as ignorant as saying a cartoon isn't a cartoon unless it's geared solely toward kids. It may be your opinion that the genre is childish and should remain that way but clearly the industry disagrees. I definitely agree that more games should be playable by all ages and I'm getting a bit sick of the "LET'S MAKE ALL OUR GAMES RATED M TO KEEP PEOPLE INTERESTED" thing that's been going on the last few years, but if a game genuinely fits into its M-rating and is a good, fun game... I'm not gonna complain too much. :/