39. NIMBYs are complaining about a train route "spoiling nature" by passing within 100 feet of their 300 unit apartment complex, yet want to reroute the train over a nearby swamp area instead.
WELL IF YOU LIKED NATURE SO MUCH, WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO LIVE IN A 300 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX? Some people's kids, I tell ya.
Granted, the line they are complaining about isn't exactly following the optimal route to get from its endpoint to its start point.
And it's not "MUH FREEDOMS", it's "KEEP THE UNWASHED AND FILTHY POOR AWAY FROM MY EXURBAN LIFESTYLE". The next town over from my town actively boycotted bus service because it's full of well-to-do people who own mansions or mcmansions, have luxury cars or gas guzzling trucks and SUVs as their daily drivers, and have a sports car or two to drive on weekends in the summer.
As if the poor who would steal would actually use public transit to get out this way. The only thieves "from" the core cities who're willing to come out this far to steal stuff are the crackheads who grew up out this way and just so happen to live in one of the core cities currently, and those types use their own cars and friends to transport shit.
Second most common argument: "Mass transit should be able to pay for its own costs." As if our highways actually do that (spoiler alert: they do not).
Third most common argument I've seen and heard: "Well I won't benefit from it, so why should we build it?" Then why should I pay via my taxes to widen that road you use daily just because it's over capacity by double its capacity? I won't benefit from it! I only drive on 6 different roads each day!
If you couldn't tell, I'm a filthy liberal in an area dominated by self-focused conservatives and mass transit makes me angrier than it should.