Pair up thread Original Revived

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lock the first one?

That has all the offical pairups... this one on the other hand is pointless.

I even removed some rules so it won't be strict anymore. :P
 
DragonTrainer said:
Wait enlighten me.What is the point of making a new pairup thread when the first one is so cool?You could at least lock it so no one is confused.
Click to expand...
I think you're pretty off on that one, read the first post.
 
Keep the old one and scratch the new one.. The old one is much better... because... uhhh. meaningful pairups?
 
Haruka said:
Keep the old one and scratch the new one.. The old one is much better... because... uhhh. meaningful pairups?
Click to expand...
How are they meaningful? Maybe the selected few are but... :/:P
 
We're keeping both of them, so we should focus on pairing in this thread, not debating it's validity or right to be here. So, back to pair ups...remember if you don't like this topic, you can user the other one. Thanks. ^_^
 
2 people agreed on their pairups. not fooling around..
 
Yeah, I don't see how they're meaningful. I doubt it very much if any of those are real life. And if you remove the rules, then they ARE the same, so you need to keep the rules.

No!!!!!! Not me and Haruka!! Who said that? Just wait until I go back to page 3 and see who said that. Payback. >.>;;
 
Nah... the rules are still there.. but it ends up with 3 simple rules.

heh.... Meaniful.. We want to promote online couples. You don't have to talk to your couple every day, unless you really love them... heh..

nuff said.
 
So only two people have been paired in 4 pages of posts?I say we keep the old one too.At least we weren't so crazy, as in this one.
 
Yea, it was a serious thing in the old one (except carol kept making those non-pairup agreements and nonpairup agreement debates). It's nothing like that here. We can get atleast 2-4 offical pairups in 1 page. See...

Common Sense

Rules and offical pairups are good togeter. :D

No offence.
 
Will you stop arguing? Don't like it, then don't post.

Anyways. I'm going to post a new list. Has anybody seen Upgraded Nick, or Raven?
 
Nick, Tsukushi-chan, and Orange are rare sights these days. I'm not sure who Raven is though...
 
I'm just saying something.Which forum has two of the same thread!?Just delete one or the other.
 
We are not going to delete or lock either, Steve told me to let it go, and he is the administrator, my boss. I closed this before, and he informed me of it's need to be open. So, we have two threads. Case closed. If you want to debate it further feel free to PM me.
 
DragonTrainer, we had two threads for the Get-Together too, for the short anyway.
Haruka said:
Yea, it was a serious thing in the old one (except carol kept making those non-pairup agreements and nonpairup agreement debates). It's nothing like that here. We can get atleast 2-4 offical pairups in 1 page. See...

Common Sense

Rules and offical pairups are good togeter. :D

No offence.
Click to expand...
Are you forgeting that you're the one that caused those "arguements" and "debates." -.-

^^Nick^^ v.2.0 has been pretty inactive for more than two month.
 
Me, Causing the debates? Nah... it was DT, and some others too.
 
Ok sorry, I won't debate my point of view anymore.So is anyone going to be paired?
 
Ok, what the heck is that supposed to mean?Was that supposed to be an insult?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top