LOL
Nothing to be sorry about! :)
Well, the way I see it is this (and this is just an opinion):
If they were going by the myth, then leaving Gyarados as a Water/Flying but still giving him solid Dragon moves would better fit in to the myth of a Carp-turned-Dragon as Gyarados is a Magikarp fish (pure Water type) who became a Dragon (with the help of Flying to get over the proverbial Dragon's Gate) and not a Dragon-born Dragon who started out as a Dragon.
If Gyarados' type became Dragon or Dragon/Water, then there is almost an assumption that Gyarados' previous unevolved form was also a Dragon.
Unlike something like Flying which can be added on as long as someone grew wings (like Dragonite who became +Flying after only being a Dragon), it is more unlikely that something can go from being one creature type (like a Dragon) to another (like a Bug).
Seeing Gyarados looking undeniably like a Dragon and then seeing the Water/Flying says that, 'Here is a Dragon who wasn't born a Dragon but became a Dragon through perseverence'.
Same thing with Charizard. Seeing him looking Dragon-like but seeing him being Fire and Flying seems to suggest that, 'Here is a Dragon who wasn't born a Dragon but became a Dragon through perseverence'.
Just my two cents. :)
Awesome way of thinking about the
Gyarados situation analytically. The above-quoted reasoning, along with the 'flying-fish gate' myth, has made me
finally accept Gyarados' current typing.
Charizard, on the other hand...I like the rationale but I really want a Fire/Dragon Pokemon (which Charizard fits perfectly!)
Infernape's typing bugged me. Blaziken was my first ever starter Pokemon, so I'm very fond of the Blaziken line. But the
same Fire-starter typing (and a unique one at that) 2 generations in a row? If Infernape had been introduced in a later generation, I don't think I would have had this problem at all...
Lugia should have been Water/Dragon with the ability Levitate as it flies (Though I'm guessing that would introduce an imbalance in gaming mechanices?). I mean, it's the Guardian of the
Seas!!!
I like how the water/space analogies mentioned earlier validate
Palkia's typing of Water/Dragon. Furthermore, the Water part makes sense as pearls are associated with underwater beings (oysters) and, IIRC, are solidified calcium deposits. Anyway, the general idea is that pearls are mostly found underwater. Finally, the 'Water' parallels Dialga's Steel-typing in its Dragon/Steel combo (diamonds are the hardest mineral on earth, thus Steel represents such hardness.) Then,
Water/pearls counteract
Steel/diamonds, which is the motif of DPPt.
Sceptile is also a good Grass/Dragon candidate...