• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Pro choice or pro life?

Pro or no?

  • Pro

    Votes: 36 56.3%
  • no

    Votes: 28 43.8%

  • Total voters
    64
Human~
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mamalia
etc, etc.

Also, I searched around the site you've been supplying for reasoning behind your beliefs. Conclusion: It's kindddaa biased. Like major biased. I'd prefer to look to a site written by those in the science realm, not the "why I'm right, and reasons you're wrong" realm. The site also isolates African-Americans, saying that they are for abortion because it's a "civil right." It also gives stereotypical reasons for being pro-choice.
Does that mean you would regard yourself as being equal to something like, a cow? Do you really think that?

"The first time, I felt like a murderer, but I did it again and again and again, and now, 20 years later, I am facing what happened to me as a doctor and as a human being. Sure, I got hard. Sure, the money was important. And oh, it was an easy thing, once I had taken the step, to see the women as animals and the babies as just tissue."

--abortionist quoted from a radio talk show by John Rice in "Abortion" Litt D. Murfreesboro, TN.
You're really just trying to dehumanise the child so that you can freely think that nothing is wrong with abortion, just like the person above.

I was just quoting that book I linked to, which was written by a doctor and his wife. I'll look through the rest of the site when I wake up to look into the rest of your claims though.

However, is there really anything right about killing an unborn child?
 
The only time that I say an unborn child may be killed is when a rape occurs. Especially when it is a teenager.
It should be up to them in that case.
But when it is between husband and wife, the child MUST be born, you can't just go around recklessly making children with your partner; you must be responsible for what you made.
 
I'm honestly 110% against it. The only reason why I'd be with it would be if some little girl somehow got pregnant due to a molester of a father, some sick stranger, or something like that. But, I highly doubt something so monstrous would be bound to happen. I would also be for it if someone who got pregnant was going to die if they gave birth. I mean, the baby is a whole new form of life, but I would feel very sorry for the child if it were born and didn't have someone to call "mother" for quite a while.

Well, I actually saw Juno for the third time on Thursday, and that is probably one of the best anti-abortion movies ever, or at least in my opinion. As showed in the movie (though fictional, it is at the same time educational and very, very realistic), she chose not to get an abortion but instead give the child away to a family she knew would take care of them. This is one of the main reasons why I'm against abortion. If you're going to have a kid but can't take care of it, why kill the thing when you can give it to a family that can love it and feed it and do all sorts of things with it?

And, of course, if you wish to give the kid away, you should definitely interview the family before you decide to give them the child. They could be molesters, or even cannibals ('course, I don't think you'll see many of those these days). Nonetheless, you need to know the family you interview is the kind that will take care of the child you're to bear.

That is all I can say on the topic.
 
I pretty much think that you can't O.K abortion because:
--A teen got pregnant due to consensual sex.
--A person cannot afford the child. (Leads me to think they should be practicing safe sex!)
--A means of birth control.

The only case I can ever see where abortion is OK is:
--Due to rape.
--Due to the health of the mother.

I just can't imagine a woman would want to live and nurture the face of their rapist. That's too twisted.

I have to give it to you guys. I came into this thread pretty liberal and more in line with "Their body, their choice" but a few well thought out posts and well placed links changed my mind.
 
This thread has always been a hot topic. That wont change. There are a lot of differing opinions here.

Anyways, back on topic, I happen to feel that they are wrong in comparing slavery with abortion. Slavery IS NOT abortion and it's not really a citizen which is protected under ANY rights doctrine until it's born in a country where the laws protect it's life. Therefore, ABORTION IS NOT MURDER. The unborn child does not enjoy the same rights because it has not yet been born into being a citizen of any country. However, I do agree that abortion is wrong in most situations. As I've said before, abortion should only be used in circumstances where the life of both the mother and the child are threatened.

I do agree that the mother shouldn't have the choice to terminate pregnancy at any point beyond the morning after. (yes, i do agree with use of the morning after pill, it's not abortion, it's a contraceptive measure, and if you think it isn't one it's because you've been lied to)
 
I think the answer is pretty clear: contraceptives. Use them. Abortion should be allowed in cases like rape or if the health of the mother is jeopardized.
 
I think the answer is pretty clear: contraceptives. Use them. Abortion should be allowed in cases like rape or if the health of the mother is jeopardized.

My thoughts exactly! Contraceptives are a very important part of sex. Not only that, but some, such as condoms, are a means of protecting yourself from HIV, herpes, etc. If pregnancy does occur, I think it's the woman's choice. I wouldn't stop her, even if I don't agree with her reasoning. Unless there was a father who would take the baby for the mother, I wouldn't push her.
 
I think the answer is pretty clear: contraceptives. Use them. Abortion should be allowed in cases like rape or if the health of the mother is jeopardized.
Yeah but contraceptives don't have a 100% guarantee. I mean yeah I see where you are going, but I just wanted to make that clear that only reduces the risk of an STD or pregnancy.
 
The only time that I say an unborn child may be killed is when a rape occurs. Especially when it is a teenager.
It should be up to them in that case.
But when it is between husband and wife, the child MUST be born, you can't just go around recklessly making children with your partner; you must be responsible for what you made.
If you just allow it for rape, what will happen is that many women will lie about how they became pregnant. I'm not saying that women are liars and I mean no offense to those who are a victim of rape, but if abortion is permitted exclusively for the reason above, both women and even abortionists will fabricate the story and falsely report so that the woman may have an abortion.

Radical feminist guru Gloria Steinem, in a 1985 interview with USA Today said that "to make abortion legal only in cases of rape and incest would force women to lie."

Up until 1988, Pennsylvania's Medicaid program funded abortions, for women who claimed they had been raped, without any requirement for reporting of the purported assault to a law enforcement agency. Under this law, abortion clinic personnel issued thinly veiled public invitations for women to simply state that they'd been raped, and the state ended up funding an average of 36 abortions a month based on such unsubstantiated claims. In 1988 the legislature added a requirement for reporting the rape to a law enforcement agency, and the average dropped to less than three abortions per month.
https://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_29.asp

So if abortion was only permitted in the case of rape, victims would need to be more responsible in informing the police and increased involvement would need to be required on the part of law enforcement agencies.
I pretty much think that you can't O.K abortion because:
--A teen got pregnant due to consensual sex.
--A person cannot afford the child. (Leads me to think they should be practicing safe sex!)
--A means of birth control.

The only case I can ever see where abortion is OK is:
--Due to rape.
--Due to the health of the mother.

I just can't imagine a woman would want to live and nurture the face of their rapist. That's too twisted.

I have to give it to you guys. I came into this thread pretty liberal and more in line with "Their body, their choice" but a few well thought out posts and well placed links changed my mind.
I think the answer is pretty clear: contraceptives. Use them. Abortion should be allowed in cases like rape or if the health of the mother is jeopardized.
Immediate hospital treatment, after rape, can be abortive through the use of the morning after pill. Since the morning after pill does work like a contraceptive as well as a abortifacient, the abortion would still be available to rape victims.

However, both rape and having an abortion are traumatic experiences and terrible tragedies. At the very least an abortion should not be encouraged. Instead, help should be provided to the mother so that she can heal.

What percentage of rape pregnancies are aborted?

Less than half. The balance carry the baby to term. In one study of 37 rape pregnancies, 28 carried to term. S. Makhorn, in Psychological Aspects of Abortion, Mall & Watts, Univ. Pub. 1979, Pg. 58
That number may well have changed in recent years, but mothers do not always kill the baby.
This thread has always been a hot topic. That wont change. There are a lot of differing opinions here.

Anyways, back on topic, I happen to feel that they are wrong in comparing slavery with abortion. Slavery IS NOT abortion and it's not really a citizen which is protected under ANY rights doctrine until it's born in a country where the laws protect it's life. Therefore, ABORTION IS NOT MURDER. The unborn child does not enjoy the same rights because it has not yet been born into being a citizen of any country. However, I do agree that abortion is wrong in most situations. As I've said before, abortion should only be used in circumstances where the life of both the mother and the child are threatened.

I do agree that the mother shouldn't have the choice to terminate pregnancy at any point beyond the morning after. (yes, i do agree with use of the morning after pill, it's not abortion, it's a contraceptive measure, and if you think it isn't one it's because you've been lied to)
I wasn't comparing slavery to abortion. I was comparing the situation black people and unborn children were/are in. Slaves weren't considered citizens or more than the property of the master, and children inside the womb aren't considered citizens either or more than the property of the mother. Did you even read my post or did you just make an assumption?

What does organised religion have to do with anything here? What does studying the bible have to do with this? Don't try and make yourself look big, especially since no one cares.

I can't believe that I have to try and explain this to you again.

Actually, stuff that. Here, read this.

The combination pill has three functions. One is to thicken the mucus plug at the opening of the cervix. This can act as a barrier mechanism to prevent sperm entrance. The main function of the pill is to prevent ovulation.

If there is no egg, there can be no fertilization. A third function is to harden the lining of the womb. If fertilization does occur, this can and, at times, does prevent implantation at one week of life resulting in a micro-abortion at that time.
https://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_35.asp

It does both - it can prevent fertilisation or it can kill the newly created life, and that's obviously an abortion.
Yeah but contraceptives don't have a 100% guarantee. I mean yeah I see where you are going, but I just wanted to make that clear that only reduces the risk of an STD or pregnancy.
Exactly. AIDS can actually move freely through the condom, even though sperm cannot.

Furthermore, teenagers are not informed that contraceptive methods are not 100% effective in preventing anything, and so teen pregnancy and STD rates rise as a result of sex education only seeming to encourage sex between teenagers.
 
If you just allow it for rape, what will happen is that many women will lie about how they became pregnant. I'm not saying that women are liars and I mean no offense to those who are a victim of rape, but if abortion is permitted exclusively for the reason above, both women and even abortionists will fabricate the story and falsely report so that the woman may have an abortion.

Exactly. AIDS can actually move freely through the condom, even though sperm cannot.

Furthermore, teenagers are not informed that contraceptive methods are not 100% effective in preventing anything, and so teen pregnancy and STD rates rise as a result of sex education only seeming to encourage sex between teenagers.

I agree with you about people cheating the system to get an abortion. Where I don't follow you is on the education front. Where I live, "abstinence only" is taught in many schools, and is shown to fail. Teens don't listen to the "don't have sex" talk and then have no idea to use a condom or contraceptive. If you're going to use sex, contraceptive do help to lower the odds of fertilization. The sex education I see doesn't condone sex AT ALL.

Also, male condoms are the single best way to prevent the spread of HIV, while having sex. Sperm doesn't move freely, neither does the HIV virus. In fact, studies show that of couples where a partner has AIDS and the other doesn't, infection rates for a year are less than 1%. Unbiased link here!

Note: Part of the link might not be found appropriate for immature minds.
 
I agree with you about people cheating the system to get an abortion. Where I don't follow you is on the education front. Where I live, "abstinence only" is taught in many schools, and is shown to fail. Teens don't listen to the "don't have sex" talk and then have no idea to use a condom or contraceptive. If you're going to use sex, contraceptive do help to lower the odds of fertilization. The sex education I see doesn't condone sex AT ALL.

Also, male condoms are the single best way to prevent the spread of HIV, while having sex. Sperm doesn't move freely, neither does the HIV virus. In fact, studies show that of couples where a partner has AIDS and the other doesn't, infection rates for a year are less than 1%. Unbiased link here!

You're right though, teens do need to be educated, but if they should be informed that nothing always works.

Note: Part of the link might not be found appropriate for immature minds.
Maybe it's just a coincidence then that teen-pregnancy has seen an increase then? [here's a link!]

Well it very well could be a coincidence given our society nowadays. A lot of things are probably contributing to the rise.

Overall, Davis and Weller estimated that condoms provided an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk when infection rates were compared in always versus never users.
[here's another link! (p.17)]

But yeah, we are sorta sliding off-topic here.
 
I'm heavily pro-life. I believe it is wrong to abort something, because no matter when or what they can feel, they're a living being at conception.

I will say though, I won't force my morals and beliefs down other people. So I feel they have the right to choose. However, only if THEY'RE paying for it.

So in the end, I'm pro-life.
 
Look... if he or she is going to suffer because of a BIG mental or physical disability and it has been proven then yea, it would be sad to see someone live and knowing that they can't do what most people take for granted.

I know this because I've seen it before. I was getting a lift home with a friend of mine last year. His mum worked at a nursing home so we had to go there to drop her off. This guy comes out in a wheelchair and his body is a bit... the only way i can politely say it without making it sound like i hate him is twisted. He also has mental issues too. I should say had cause he did because he passed away a few months ago.

Still if teens want to get into bed and... you know make out without thinking about it in the first place, then a month later finding out that her boyfriend got her pregnant... well it's both their fault for doing what they did in the first place.

Other than that I believe MOST people deserve to live.
 
I'm Pro Choice...but if people are seriously having unprotected sex and they don't want a baby, then I don't think that's a very good choice.
 
I don't like the idea of taking a 'soon to be' life.
But hell, life is taken every second, and I am in no place to judge what a mother decides.
I personally admire rape victims keeping the rape child by choice though.

I'm Pro Choice...but if people are seriously having unprotected sex and they don't want a baby, then I don't think that's a very good choice.

Rape happens too you know.

Edit; I can admire the rape victim keeping her rape child because even though that extra life was thrown at her, she made the choice to keep it.
It's sort of like saying 'I love my children no matter what'.
 
Last edited:
I am not Pro-Abortion, I'm Pro-Choice.
While I don't full agree with abortion, I think women who want to should always have the option. If you don't want to abort your baby that's fine with me, but no one should ever be able to push their beliefs and morals onto other people by changing the law.
 
Back
Top