• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • PokéCommunity supports the Stop Killing Games movement. If you're a resident of the UK or EU, consider signing one of the petitions to stop publishers from destroying games. Click here for more information!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

The Daily-Chit Chat of 09'

Status
Not open for further replies.
No swearing please and thank you.

And some professors ask that you don't use Wikipedia for papers/projects in their class. It's actually a really big debate in the academia world right now over the use of Wikipedia in research.
But, the fact of the matter is, most of the times Wikipedia is more factual than false. ):

And, yeah, I can't wait for the Bad Romance premiere. Perhaps I should sign up as well =3=;
 
That's still censor bypassing and still breaking the rules.

:3
How is that bypassing the censor? It's the exact same thing the censor would show.

iGaga: Is posting **** bypassing the censor?
iGaga: :/
Erica: not bypassing but you might still get a warning for swearing all the same

Wont do it though. : 3
 
ugh

I don't know how many times I've explained this rule to someone on this forum in my time as staff.

You still swore. It's still against the rules. Just because those cute wittle stars come up doesn't mean you can swear. That's not what they're there for. They don't give you free reign to say whatever you want. ~_~
 
ugh

I don't know how many times I've explained this rule to someone on this forum in my time as staff.

You still swore. It's still against the rules. Just because those cute wittle stars come up doesn't mean you can swear. That's not what they're there for. They don't give you free reign to say whatever you want. ~_~
Yes, but my point is that I would get in trouble for swearing, not censor bypass. D:
 
They should just be glad Wikipedia is a readable source! =_=;
 
They should just be glad Wikipedia is a readable source! =_=;

And why should they be glad? o.O I can only see them being glad if it wasn't. ;_;

First of all, who is "they"? The professors?
 
ಠ_ಠ

You knew what I meant ctep. Why must you always be so difficult and annoying?
Difficult, because I am a "blonde" and it is hard for me to get things right off the bat sometimes. D:

Annoying, because I like it.

Censored for Protection: ewww
iGaga: o____o
iGaga: Whar?
iGaga: What*
Censored for Protection: Joe kissed Stella
iGaga: What? XD
Censored for Protection: I'm watching JONAS
Censored for Protection: so...yeah
iGaga: Wow
iGaga: XDDDD
 
And why should they be glad? o.O I can only see them being glad if it wasn't. ;_;

First of all, who is "they"? The professors?
Because most other sources are complicated, irrelevant, specialized, incomplete, questionable, too old, and endless problems and dissatisfactions that make them not worth reading.

They as in the professors, yes.

Oh yeah, they'd definitely have nothing to * about if it was unreadable to them. =)
 
Totally valid reasoning. How silly of me to question "because I feel like it." Astounding. Amazing. Etc.
Well, I cant see any reason why you would question that as well. After all, that's not what I said. ; 3

I said I like it because I couldn't think of another reason that didn't fall under me being "blonde."
 
sar⋅casm
/ˈsɑrkæzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sahr-kaz-uhm]

–noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.

Totally valid reasoning. How silly of me to question "because I like it." Astounding. Amazing. Etc.*

THERE! FIXED!
 
It pays to have protection! ;D that was me
I forgot you got a name change, so I was very confused for a bit there. ^^;
sar⋅casm
/ˈsɑrkæzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [sahr-kaz-uhm]

–noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.

Totally valid reasoning. How silly of me to question "because I like it." Astounding. Amazing. Etc.*

THERE! FIXED!
Yes, I got that you were being sarcastic, and I commented on that. Hence why I put the reason why I put a poor reason. : 3
 
You drama queens, stop female dog-ing, please! >>
@_@

I get what you mean, but.."dog-ing"? o.O;

Oh my God, I just found out that Britney is Luke. ^^;
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top