The Daily-Chit Chat of 09'

Status
Not open for further replies.
You people scare me sometimes....lol

Combined lightnings and my cherrim army will prevail!

Soo....im kinda bored.. are any of you people virgins lol?
 
Last edited:
My test results:
Spoiler:

However, I've always pegged myself as being more along the lines of neutral good, chaotic good, or true neutral, to be honest.
 
Spoiler:


That is me. Yes it is.
 
I got

"A lawful neutral character acts as law, tradition, or a personal code directs him. Order and organization are paramount to him. He may believe in personal order and live by a code or standard, or he may believe in order for all and favor a strong, organized government. Lawful neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you are reliable and honorable without being a zealot. However, lawful neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it seeks to eliminate all freedom, choice, and diversity in society."

I was two points away from True Neutral

...I seek to eliminate all freedom, choice, and diversity in society? Well that's news to me. That doesn't sound like fun at all
 
Last edited:
Ctep said:

You Are:
However, lawful neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it seeks to eliminate all freedom, choice, and diversity in society.
Click to expand...


That is so me.

[AGELIMIT]
Spoiler:
[/AGELIMIT]
 
Spoiler:


Lol why am I not surprised.
 
True Neutral- A true neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. He doesn't feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most true neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil after all, he would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, he's not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some true neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. True neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion. However, true neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it represents apathy, indifference, and a lack of conviction.
 
My result:

Neutral Good



Neutral Good- A neutral good character does the best that a good person can do. He is devoted to helping others. He works with kings and magistrates but does not feel beholden to them. Neutral good is the best alignment you can be because it means doing what is good without bias for or against order. However, neutral good can be a dangerous alignment because because it advances mediocrity by limiting the actions of the truly capable.
 
Chaotic Neutral- A chaotic neutral character follows his whims. He is an individualist first and last. He values his own liberty but doesn't strive to protect others' freedom. He avoids authority, resents restrictions, and challenges traditions. A chaotic neutral character does not intentionally disrupt organizations as part of a campaign of anarchy. To do so, he would have to be motivated either by good (and a desire to liberate others) or evil (and a desire to make those different from himself suffer). A chaotic neutral character may be unpredictable, but his behavior is not totally random. He is not as likely to jump off a bridge as to cross it. Chaotic neutral is the best alignment you can be because it represents true freedom from both society's restrictions and a do-gooder's zeal. However, chaotic neutral can be a dangerous alignment because it seeks to eliminate all authority, harmony, and order in society.

I don't think that's entirely accurate, but some of it is. :<
 
o__o Are we talking about D&D? :3 I love that game <3 I play with some people at school and one of my teachers is an official DM <33

:3 I have two characters. My twin-bladed ranger-elf named Evander.. and my young Warlord human named Remnant <3

Both are neutral-good ._. I actually haven't decided yet.. but chatotic neutral sounds cool~
 
Jack O'Neill said:
The problem with the traditional D&D alignment system is that it can be difficult to find competent roleplayers who can actually embody those alignments properly. More often than not, you'll encounter at least one example of lawful stupid, chaotic stupid, stupid good, stupid evil, and/or stupid neutral.
Click to expand...

:/ Yeah.. that's true. There's one guy that plays with us who's pretty much like that.
"Hey can I throw a beer bottle at the king?" I swear if it wasn't for me and my super luck at rolling 20s and like.. history or nature checks sometimes.. we'd probably all be dead by now just because of the situations he puts us in.. ._.;;;
.o. Oh well..
 
Kura said:
:/ Yeah.. that's true. There's one guy that plays with us who's pretty much like that.
"Hey can I throw a beer bottle at the king?" I swear if it wasn't for me and my super luck at rolling 20s and like.. history or nature checks sometimes.. we'd probably all be dead by now just because of the situations he puts us in.. ._.;;;
.o. Oh well..
Click to expand...
Yeah, that's definitely an example of chaotic stupid you're playing with. If he keeps leading you and the rest of the group into untenable situations with his actions (I doubt throwing beer bottles at the king flies well with the royal guards), have your DM have a nice, long discussion with him about the nature of the alignment system; if he still persists despite being lectured, boot him.

What version of D&D are you playing, anyway?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top