• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

The world's first 5.5 TERAPIXEL camera!

doesn't matter

doesn't matter

  • Very Chatty Chatot Chatty Chatot Pink Heart Yellow Heart
    • 5,849
    Posts
    18
    Years
    • Seen today
    [PokeCommunity.com] The world's first 5.5 TERAPIXEL camera!


    How amazing is the progression of technology? Digital cameras have developed so quickly there isn't even any storage media to hold one picture. Or is there?

    Discuss.
     
    I'm pretty sure this isn't real, mainly because we haven't even had a Gigaixel camera. (besides the fact that the camera in the pictures looks like a toy.) Considering 7.0 MegaPixels has the res to print out a postersize picture without distortion or pixelation. nice try though.
     
    Gerri Shin® said:
    I'm pretty sure this isn't real, mainly because we haven't even had a Gigaixel camera. (besides the fact that the camera in the pictures looks like a toy.) Considering 7.0 MegaPixels has the res to print out a postersize picture without distortion or pixelation. nice try though.
    Click to expand...

    Engrish is always a laugh :)
     
    Gerri Shin® said:
    I'm pretty sure this isn't real, mainly because we haven't even had a Gigaixel camera. (besides the fact that the camera in the pictures looks like a toy.) Considering 7.0 MegaPixels has the res to print out a postersize picture without distortion or pixelation. nice try though.
    Click to expand...
    Ditto.

    Makes me wonder why, of all members, a moderator would advocate this...


    Still, if it is real, it's redundant beyond the point of being ridiculously redundant. Nope, it's fake, doesn't even have a real lens.
     
    Last edited:
    雀 said:
    Ditto.

    Makes me wonder why, of all members, a moderator would advocate this...


    Still, if it is real, it's redundant beyond the point of being ridiculously redundant. Nope, it's fake, doesn't even have a real lens.
    Click to expand...

    Whoosh.

    Someone needs to get their sarcasm detector fixed! :P
     
    FIRST OFF: That camera is adorable. I'd buy it just cause it has a penguin on the front.

    SECOND: I doubt the "first 5.5 terapixel camera" would be blue with a penguin on it. 'nuff said ^^;
     
    j_ said:
    Whoosh.

    Someone needs to get their sarcasm detector fixed! :P
    Click to expand...
    No really, this is just spam to me and I would have it locked/deleted. Good picture, bad place to show it. Harr I'm a grumpy old git to ya'll, yes I know.

    By the way Amachi, where you put "or is there", there are drives at 700TB and up (they're big, like CRT TVs), so yes.
     
    Last edited:
    Gerri Shin® said:
    I'm pretty sure this isn't real, mainly because we haven't even had a Gigaixel camera. (besides the fact that the camera in the pictures looks like a toy.) Considering 7.0 MegaPixels has the res to print out a postersize picture without distortion or pixelation. nice try though.
    Click to expand...
    Your powers of deduction are quite amazing!
    雀 said:
    No really, this is just spam to me and I would have it locked/deleted. Good picture, bad place to show it. Harr I'm a grumpy old git to ya'll, yes I know.

    By the way Amachi, where you put "or is there", there are drives at 700TB and up (they're big, like CRT TVs), so yes.
    Click to expand...
    You are a grumpy old git, stop it! :P It's relative to the section and I thought I'd show it to you all.

    And I thought there would be something out there big enough, but nothing for the average home consumer, correct? At least nothing feasible. Furthermore, where would the actual camera store the photo taken?

    And thanks Zana, you rock XD
     
    Amachi said:
    And I thought there would be something out there big enough, but nothing for the average home consumer, correct? At least nothing feasible. Furthermore, where would the actual camera store the photo taken?
    Click to expand...
    Seemingly not without over $10,000 to spend. The camera would, with today's technology, probably have to be USB connected to one of these drives. xD
     
    wow that is a really small camera if you have to take a snapshot that close up!!!
     
    Ok so I had a video for it but ray liked it to much :)

    Also I know I rock Amachi but you rock more.
     
    Last edited:
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top