Triple Type Pokemon?

[Itz Spadezz]

Ummm no just no... Some Pokemon would be way to overpowered and in general its just an all around dumb idea

 

[Safetyfirst]

Triple types would be good, and make sense for a lot more pokemon, but it would bring too many new strengths and multiple weaknesses

 

[loliwin]

noooooooo! XD

I think it aint a great idea tbh. There'd be hell lot more damage and riggedness.

 

[myrrhman]

move cooldowns,

Hyper beam and his friends want a word.

 

[blue]

I think it woud make it MUCH for confusing.

 

[myrrh25]

Yeah, because the little kids would be able to handle finding a 6x multiplier kill.

 

[NickofTime]

Yeah ok, i agree with the general consensus, its just adding on weaknesses, do ppl not realize that the reason pokemon have dual types is to get RID of weaknesses gyrados is flying because of flyings weakness to ice and waters weakness to grass
half of the metagame would stay in heart gold, where things made sense the other half would rage quit the pokemon franchise

plus dragon/fire/flying charizard would be weak to ice, no one wants to see a fire type be weak to ice

 

[`Espeon]

Nah, it would make things even more annoying. >.>

Ghost/Dark is already a pain in the butt, because it has no weakness to any attacks. If we get Pokemon with 3 types and no weakness, the whole Pokemon world is going to be screwed due to Charzard spamming Thunder. D:<

Yes, we're doomed if that happens. Dx

 

[Magikpeople]

Flygon should have 4 types: Dragon/Ground/Flying/Bug
But yeah, it would get really confusing and it's not that necessary