I do not really like that article. It brings up good points but it seems to me to be biased. It is using common internet-ways to express emotion, in favor of Linux.
Of
course it's biased, it's trying to get a point across. You don't waste space in an essay highlighting the points that don't support your statement. =/
It's just interesting to look at things from a new perspective. Especially the Lego analogy. That really makes sense.
It's not all biased. It's trying to explain how are different pieces of software and the different products are there for people with different needs and abilities. It says that Linux is not simply a poor-man's Windows (or MacOS for that matter) or that it's not just a way to avoid viruses. It's a different suite for the people that want to venture into that side of things - the people who are genuinely interested in trying out Linux and aren't afraid to give up some time to learn about it.
Basically, what I got out of it was:
If you don't like Linux, it's not the product for you, so don't waste time complaining. Also, the mere presence of it shows that some people want to use it, which justifies both the OSs existance and is a good enough reason for people to use it.
As I said, which I think applies to this entire thread. If you don't like Linux, leave the people who
want to use it to discuss it in peace. It's like coming to this forum and then complaining about pokemon's flaws and acting mislead or ripped-off. If you don't like it - stay out.
This isn't a stab at you, by the way. I'm just venting my thoughts. :D