5th Gen What DON'T you want to see in the new games?

Haowakeorden said:
If that was a result of switching to a new engine, then they should probably have worked more on it so that it didn't need to pause as much. In that case there was certainly a progression in that aspect from Diamond (new engine, long pause) to HeartGold (same engine as Diamond, but unnoticeable pause). If the new games use an even newer engine, hopefully they've worked that out already.
Click to expand...
Well there was even a big change from diamond and pearl to platinum, which was much more fast paced. I dont know if you noticed but after a while in D/P the load times increase when enetering through doors (in and out). I am positive that their using a new engine and i would expect a few slow-times.
 
Sora's Nobody said:
I would like the encounter rate in general to be lower, Well.. Espicially the places where your to stressed to think about encountering pokemon, Like above, The victory road. You're confused enough as it is.
Click to expand...

Yeah as mentioned, it's meant to be challenging. If anything, I think they'll increase the encounter rate, considering it's a new region, new Pokemon to discover and get to know, so...idk, I think wild Pokemon in caves will be more common than before sadly. :(
 
Forever said:


Yeah as mentioned, it's meant to be challenging. If anything, I think they'll increase the encounter rate, considering it's a new region, new Pokemon to discover and get to know, so...idk, I think wild Pokemon in caves will be more common than before sadly. :(
Click to expand...
What makes you think that?(cave) But yeah i get what you mean with the new region thing.
 
I hope B/W won't have a battle frontier in it. I don't like battle frontiers because they're too hard for me. I won't mind if there was just a battle tower and hopefully the new battle subway will be better.

I also don't want to have to take up too much space in my party with HM slaves when I'm on Victory Road.
 
AliceBlaze said:
I hope B/W won't have a battle frontier in it. I don't like battle frontiers because they're too hard for me. I won't mind if there was just a battle tower and hopefully the new battle subway will be better.

I also don't want to have to take up too much space in my party with HM slaves when I'm on Victory Road.
Click to expand...
Yeah i never went to the battle frontier. Well maybe there wont be HM's as such as now TM's are reusable.
 
pokewalker said:
If there are no HM's, how can we fly then?
In a world without fly, i'm gonna cry.
Click to expand...
Well ok what i meant is that hm will still be there, but they will be at tabel level with tms. You would now be able to delete as you wish ect.. So if you HAVE to learn you pokemon fly, you could just learn it fly and then when your nearing your ultimate battle, force a tm down its throat.
 
i dont want to see super easy or super hard gym puzzles.
like, in DPPt, all you had to do in the first gym was walk up to roark and battle a couple of trainers.
 
cyan. said:
i dont want to see super easy or super hard gym puzzles.
like, in DPPt, all you had to do in the first gym was walk up to roark and battle a couple of trainers.
Click to expand...
Yeah i know, i dont want that either. And hopefully it wont be, but we never no its be like that for all most all first gyms.
 
pokewalker said:
If there are no HM's, how can we fly then?
In a world without fly, i'm gonna cry.
Click to expand...
You wouldn't need to teach the move to a Pokemon. Any flying type Pokemon should be able to carry you without teaching Fly.

The same should apply with water Pokemon and carrying you across the water without teaching it Surf.

Also, why can't a Pokemon just cut down trees or move and smash rocks without teaching them a move which is no good in battle?

Game Freak should listen to us more.
 
AliceBlaze said:
You wouldn't need to teach the move to a Pokemon. Any flying type Pokemon should be able to carry you without teaching Fly.

The same should apply with water Pokemon and carrying you across the water without teaching it Surf.

Also, why can't a Pokemon just cut down trees or move and smash rocks without teaching them a move which is no good in battle?

Game Freak should listen to us more.
Click to expand...
Yeah, i know. But its part of the strategy. You have to think carefully about what pokemon should learn the move, yet will be able to beat x POKEMON.
 
I don't want HMs to be non-sensible like they are now.
Nothing using Fly that is smaller than you. No Surfing Piplup, Tauros, Rhydon, or Linoone.

Things like that. It doesn't make any senseeee. D:
​
 
The Red Chain said:
I don't want HMs to be non-sensible like they are now.
Nothing using Fly that is smaller than you. No Surfing Piplup, Tauros, Rhydon, or Linoone.

Things like that. It doesn't make any senseeee. D:
​
Click to expand...
Yeah i know what you mean, like a flying pidgeot. Points to the funny comic.
 
pokewalker said:
If there are no HM's, how can we fly then?
In a world without fly, i'm gonna cry.
Click to expand...

:cer_laugh: that rhymed, i dunno if it was intentional or not, but its still awesome :cer_laugh:

i dont wanna see the common normal type& its evolution on every single route...
ill go mad people...
bidoofs... so many bidoofs...
its just way too annoying :(
 
Volroc said:
:cer_laugh: that rhymed, i dunno if it was intentional or not, but its still awesome :cer_laugh:

i dont wanna see the common normal type& its evolution on every single route...
ill go mad people...
bidoofs... so many bidoofs...
its just way too annoying :(
Click to expand...
Yeah i know what you mean, the routes wild pokemon should have more variety.
 
Sora's Nobody said:
Hha well if you look at the map it does look like there is more than 2.
Click to expand...
I hope so :D!
I also don't want to see easy puzzles, we need a challenge, make the little kids cry if you have to GF, just make them stressful :D!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top