• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

What Pokemon you would remove from the Pokedex?

GEODUDE YUCK YUCK YUCK I HATE IT.
Zubat. Its blind as brock.
Dunsparce
 
Sesen said:

Most of the Hoenn generation. I had almost forgotten how bad 2/3 of those pokemon suck.
Click to expand...

I cried a little ;~;

Anyways I think Dunsparce should be removed. I didnt even know it existed until I played Leafgreen. And then I tried looking for it on Pokemon Crystal and that turned out to be a failure.
 
I wouldn't remove any Pokemon from the Pokedex. How would you like it if you created something, and someone told you, "ugh, get rid of that, and it'll be better!"
To me, every Pokemon's design is someone's art. Removing any of them is like...blasphemy.
 
I'd remove the 4th and 5th generation of pokemon. Kanto, Johto, and Hoenn we're the original and the best in my eyes. Now, Nintendo is running out of ideas, and its just getting sad now. They're morphing human species together to make POKEMON species.
 
I just thought of something else. It's okay to dislike some Pokemon over others, but removing them from the Pokedex...is just wrong.
In real life, pretty much every animal has a purpose in nature, whether it seems like it does to you or not. Even if you don't like the animal, it would be a bad idea to kill it off.
I know this seems silly in the Pokemon world (what do they need with Magikarp?)
But all of them are put there for a reason.
(Though, how Mr. Mime helps the Poke-environment, I'll never know!)

I know, I know..."it's not real, it's a game...bleh blah blah"
 
Blissey. I hate that thing so much, and Happiny too. I don't get what's so cute about Happiny, it looks ugly as hell to me. And Blissey... is just a pain. Even if I do pwn my friend's Blissey every time, it's still annoying.
 
Eevee, just to piss people off. On a serious note I really don't know. :(
 
I would remove magikarp from the pokedex but keep its evolved form but it be a single evo.
 
Magikarp. Just go home, Magikarp. It should've been replaced by Feebas, who SHOULD have the choice to either evolve to Gyarados or Milotic. Makes sense, right?​
 
I have to say some Pokemon are useless, so I'd say either remove them or maybe add some that are quite better and useful.
 
I wouldn't get rid of any of them (although I'm kinda getting fed up with the amount of legendaries), there are some pokemon I don't like and some that I wish people would stop drooling over but I have no need to get rid of a pokemon that I don't like, I can simply not use it. If I loved every pokemon then Nintendo wouldn't be doing their job right as they wouldn't be appealing to people with different tastes then me. I would much rather have lots of people playing, enjoying, over-hyping some pokemon and have pokemon in the game that I hate then having a game with only pokemon I like in it and hardly anyone else playing it.

I also find it more realistic and enjoyable to have pokemon I don't like, just as their are real animals I dislike there are pokemon. Just as their are real animal that are over-hyped (stupid pandas :P ) there are pokemon and just as their are weak animal (I mean who could a duck beat up...) there are pokemon. It gives the game more depth and meaning in my eyes, it also makes the world a lot easier to lose yourself in when you sit down to play.
 
I would take away none, all the pokemon are awesome.
 
Charizard i hate it becuase everytime i see a poll fav starter, fav Fire type, Fav Flying etc... it always Charizard. I dont see why Charizard is so popular. That is why it should be gone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top