- 14,092
- Posts
- 14
- Years
- Sunnyshore City
- Seen Dec 3, 2022
Given the recent surge in support, this could be the tipping point for the legalization of Same-Sex marriage in the U.S.
How do you think the court will rule? And why?
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether the state of California can ban same-sex marriage.
The justices are weighing a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex nuptials, passed after gay marriage became legal there.
They could uphold the ban, narrowly overturn it, or invalidate all state same-sex marriage bans in America.
The hearing comes as opinion polls show a rapid rise in public support for same-sex marriage.
As arguments began on Tuesday, justices questioned both the merits of the arguments and the parties' legal standing to bring the case to the high court.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, often seen as a swing vote between the four conservative and four liberal justices, suggested that children of same-sex couples would suffer an "immediate legal injury" from the ban.
Defenders of Proposition 8 marched to the court in the hundreds, perhaps thousands, accompanied by a band of kilted pipers. As the numbers swelled, the police presence thickened.
At times, the antagonists faced off. I watched a shouting match between two young men with duelling signs: one drawing attention to suicides that followed homophobic bullying, the other stating that homosexuality was against God's will.
Will the sound and fury make any mark on the nine justices inside? Of course not. But on an issue that defines our times, it signals the depth of feeling on both sides.
Among the spectators in the court on Tuesday is a lesbian cousin of conservative-leaning Chief Justice John Roberts, the Los Angeles Times reports.
Tuesday's case concerns California's ban on same-sex marriage, known as Proposition 8, which was approved by that state's voters in a referendum in November 2008.
Its passage came only after some 18,000 gay marriages had already taken place in the state, following California's legalisation of such unions earlier the same year.
Two same-sex couples filed a lawsuit, known as Hollingsworth v Perry, against Proposition 8.
As the state of California refused to defend it, the organisation that had sponsored Proposition 8 stepped in as defendants.
In 2010, a federal court ruled against Proposition 8, saying the state had not demonstrated a good reason for infringing on what the judge saw as the fundamental right of all couples to marry.
Supporters of the ban appealed against that ruling, but the court of appeals also ruled the amendment unconstitutional.
Anti-gay marriage activists then petitioned the Supreme Court to review the case. They want the question of whether marriage should be defined as a union between a man and a woman to be left up to individual US states.
The Obama administration is not taking part in the case but has filed what is called a "friend of the court" brief asking the Supreme Court to strike down the anti-gay marriage amendment.
In the Hollingsworth v Perry case, the court could uphold the ban, strike it down and invalidate similar bans in other states, or rule narrowly that California's law was unconstitutional.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear another case on same-sex marriage: a challenge to a federal law defining marriage as between a man and a woman only. The 1996 law, the Defense of Marriage Act, denies federal tax and other benefits to same-sex married couples.
Both cases are expected to be decided by June.
Currently, nine US states and Washington DC permit same-sex marriage. Eight other states allow civil unions or domestic partnerships with virtually all state marriage benefits, but do not allow couples to marry.
Recent opinion polls have shown a rapid growth in public support for the issue, with most Americans now believing it should be legal.
The Supreme Court cases follow a flurry of declarations in support of gay marriage by high-profile figures, including last week by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Days earlier, Ohio's Rob Portman became the first Republican senator to back gay marriage.
And now three Democratic senators - Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Mark Warner of Virginia and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia - have adopted the same stance.
How do you think the court will rule? And why?