• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Greenlit: Pokemon Designs: What’s changed?

Charlie Brown

[font=lato]coolcoolcool[/font]
4,240
Posts
12
Years
  • Every Generation you get people saying "Gen X designs suck!!!" so thought it would be good to capitalise on that for SwSh and look at what has changed for Pokemon designs from Kanto to now. Inspired by a post I read once.

    Potential topics to cover:
    — Process changes (more artists now, Sugimori much less involved)
    — Body shape changes: read an interesting post which looked at body proportions in Pokemon in early gens compared to now, which basically found more even weight distribution in earlier designs, whereas newer designs have shorter limbs. Comparing original mons to their Alola/Galar equivalents (particularly ones with largely similar body shape designs eg Vulpix, Ponyta) would be interesting too
    — Eyes: Now Pokemon have much rounder eyes compared to the more triangular eyes of early gens. This is both due to pixel requirements (less pixels in sprites in early gens so they were limited in how they could represent eyes — this point is also valid for body shapes and limb size in Gen 1) but also marketability for merch nowadays and trying to stay on trend with 'monster' designs eg Yokai Watch.
    — Would also be interesting to do a breakdown of Pokemon by percentage per gen: % of humanoid Pokemon, % of "non-living" eg Voltorb, Vanilluxe, % of animals/birds/insects/fish, % of plants. Would be interesting (I suspect humanoid is increasing...)
     
    Last edited:
    25,540
    Posts
    12
    Years
  • An in-depth look at design would be interesting. +1
    Might be worth looking at JoCat's video on the subject for inspiration too.
     

    bobandbill

    one more time
    16,935
    Posts
    16
    Years
  • — Would also be interesting to do a breakdown of Pokemon by percentage per gen: % of humanoid Pokemon, % of "non-living" eg Voltorb, Vanilluxe, % of animals/birds/insects/fish, % of plants. Would be interesting (I suspect humanoid is increasing...)
    Ooh, yes, this sort of analysis would be super to see.

    Would be worth exploring the people behind the Pokemon themselves. Not all pokemon are known to have their 'creator' clearly stated, but certainly we could break things down by e.g. "James Turner made these", etc.
     
    27,751
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • +1 on this!

    You could also perhaps cover what hasn't changed as well, either in this article, or maybe for another article as well. :]
     

    Charlie Brown

    [font=lato]coolcoolcool[/font]
    4,240
    Posts
    12
    Years
  • Might be worth looking at JoCat's video on the subject for inspiration too.

    Would be worth exploring the people behind the Pokemon themselves. Not all pokemon are known to have their 'creator' clearly stated, but certainly we could break things down by e.g. "James Turner made these", etc.

    Good calls! Will prioritise the Dexit article before this one but will get started on this later this month then :)
     
    Back
    Top