• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Greenlit: Pokemon Designs: What’s changed?

Charlie Brown

[font=lato]coolcoolcool[/font]
  • 4,237
    Posts
    13
    Years
    Every Generation you get people saying "Gen X designs suck!!!" so thought it would be good to capitalise on that for SwSh and look at what has changed for Pokemon designs from Kanto to now. Inspired by a post I read once.

    Potential topics to cover:
    — Process changes (more artists now, Sugimori much less involved)
    — Body shape changes: read an interesting post which looked at body proportions in Pokemon in early gens compared to now, which basically found more even weight distribution in earlier designs, whereas newer designs have shorter limbs. Comparing original mons to their Alola/Galar equivalents (particularly ones with largely similar body shape designs eg Vulpix, Ponyta) would be interesting too
    — Eyes: Now Pokemon have much rounder eyes compared to the more triangular eyes of early gens. This is both due to pixel requirements (less pixels in sprites in early gens so they were limited in how they could represent eyes — this point is also valid for body shapes and limb size in Gen 1) but also marketability for merch nowadays and trying to stay on trend with 'monster' designs eg Yokai Watch.
    — Would also be interesting to do a breakdown of Pokemon by percentage per gen: % of humanoid Pokemon, % of "non-living" eg Voltorb, Vanilluxe, % of animals/birds/insects/fish, % of plants. Would be interesting (I suspect humanoid is increasing...)
     
    Last edited:
    — Would also be interesting to do a breakdown of Pokemon by percentage per gen: % of humanoid Pokemon, % of "non-living" eg Voltorb, Vanilluxe, % of animals/birds/insects/fish, % of plants. Would be interesting (I suspect humanoid is increasing...)
    Ooh, yes, this sort of analysis would be super to see.

    Would be worth exploring the people behind the Pokemon themselves. Not all pokemon are known to have their 'creator' clearly stated, but certainly we could break things down by e.g. "James Turner made these", etc.
     
    Might be worth looking at JoCat's video on the subject for inspiration too.

    Would be worth exploring the people behind the Pokemon themselves. Not all pokemon are known to have their 'creator' clearly stated, but certainly we could break things down by e.g. "James Turner made these", etc.

    Good calls! Will prioritise the Dexit article before this one but will get started on this later this month then :)
     
    Back
    Top