• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

2016 US Presidential Elections Thread [Trump Wins]

In some ways, it might not even make sense for Trump to try hard in Texas. Why? Because Cruz is "supposed" to win Texas. If Cruz is defeated in Texas, he drops out and Trump loses the benefit of the vote split with Rubio. Sure some Cruz supporters may also move to Trump, but why even risk it with the current lead? The fact that Florida and Ohio vote two weeks later makes a big difference.

Cruz is the more likely candidate to stay in, even if he lost. Rubio hasn't won anything, while Cruz has a bit of an advantage there. I think it'll be an interesting Tuesday for sure.
 
Cruz is the more likely candidate to stay in, even if he lost. Rubio hasn't won anything, while Cruz has a bit of an advantage there. I think it'll be an interesting Tuesday for sure.
Actually, I would think that Cruz would be more likely to drop out if he didn't win Texas. He has less to "look forward" to than Rubio. Whether or not it is logical, Rubio probably won't leave unless he is crushed in Texas. Also, even if Rubio hasn't "won" anything, he's only one delegate behind Cruz.
 
Someone has calculated him to have a 97% chance of winning the election if he gets the nomination, and apparently he's accurate but w/e.

Source.

Uhhh considering that comes from some conservative shill website a la Breitbart, I doubt it. I'll go grab the stats, but Trump polls at an insane 94% unfavorable rating with black voters, and his unfavorability with Latinos is in the 80% range. With women, his unfavorable rating is in the 70% range if I recall. He literally alienates every major voting block except older, fringe republicans which is a dying demographic to start with. Why do you think the establishment GOP will stop at nothing to elect anyone but him, specifically a Latino in Marco Rubio? He's leading the party into an electoral slaughter.
 
Uhhh considering that comes from some conservative shill website a la Breitbart, I doubt it. I'll go grab the stats, but Trump polls at an insane 94% unfavorable rating with black voters, and his unfavorability with Latinos is in the 80% range. With women, his unfavorable rating is in the 70% range if I recall. He literally alienates every major voting block except older, fringe republicans which is a dying demographic to start with. Why do you think the establishment GOP will stop at nothing to elect anyone but him, specifically a Latino in Marco Rubio? He's leading the party into an electoral slaughter.

It was just a calculation, so it doesn't mean it's entirely active. And I'm pretty sure Daily-Mail is a UK-based source anyways. Besides, I doubt any of those voters would be insane enough to vote for another Clinton.

Also, the traditional Republican would be pro-Establishment. Trump is anti-Establishment.
 
Uhhh considering that comes from some conservative shill website a la Breitbart, I doubt it. I'll go grab the stats, but Trump polls at an insane 94% unfavorable rating with black voters, and his unfavorability with Latinos is in the 80% range. With women, his unfavorable rating is in the 70% range if I recall. He literally alienates every major voting block except older, fringe republicans which is a dying demographic to start with. Why do you think the establishment GOP will stop at nothing to elect anyone but him, specifically a Latino in Marco Rubio? He's leading the party into an electoral slaughter.

Congress had high unfavorability ratings in 2014, yet the GOP won big. Obama was unfavorable in 2012, yet he "won". Unfavorability ratings don't predict the outcome of an election.
 
It was just a calculation, so it doesn't mean it's entirely active. And I'm pretty sure Daily-Mail is a UK-based source anyways. Besides, I doubt any of those voters would be insane enough to vote for another Clinton.

Helmut's prediction originally made the rounds on some Breitbart affiliate site and went from there. Well, considering there's plenty of insane people voting for Trump in these primaries, you never know. ;D

Congress had high unfavorability ratings in 2014, yet the GOP won big. Obama was unfavorable in 2012, yet he "won". Unfavorability ratings don't predict the outcome of an election.

Because midterm electorates don't favor democrats and incumbents, especially incumbent democrats, so midterm elections are far from "mandates", it was expected far before November. Obama never trailed Romney in national polling leading up to the election and the 47% comment buried Romney months before the election, we knew this leading up to election day. On top of all that, while unfavorability ratings don't necessarily translate to not being elected or vice-versa, because they are different things, and that's exactly my point. A survey of likely voters usually does give better insight into who gets elected, however, and that's what I was referencing here, there is your difference. This is data, not conjecture. Multiple polls in upcoming primary states demonstrate Trump, much like his buddy Christie, is vasty unpopular outside of his narrow base:

Unpopularity within his own party, in general

Vastly unpopular with Hispanics, etc.

74% unfavorability in NJ with minorities in general, as bad Christie's numbers

Slate said:
A Quinnipiac poll of Ohio shows a similar result, with a 71 percent unfavorable rating among millennials, a 66 percent rating among women, and a 94 percent rating among black Americans. Other surveys show similar results, with deep antipathy for Trump among blacks.

Hard to win a nomination if multiple, major voting blocks despise you.
 
Helmut's prediction originally made the rounds on some Breitbart affiliate site and went from there. Well, considering there's plenty of insane people voting for Trump in these primaries, you never know. ;D
Hell, I only know about it because my insane Neo-Con parents blast Fox News up in the house all the time. I still say he has a fair shot though, and I do see him having troubles with Sanders but not Shillary.
 
If opposing voting blocks don't show up in force, then it doesn't really matter whether they oppose you or not, right?
 
If opposing voting blocks don't show up in force, then it doesn't really matter whether they oppose you or not, right?

True, but the negativity and the amount of fear towards a Trump nomination/potential presidency should get people to the polls simply to avoid that outcome. Given that this is a presidential election, this electorate is a higher % of minorities than during mid term years, and the Democratic frontrunner is more popular within her own party than the other one, which should equate to electoral support. All Hilary has to do is beat the "Fear of Trump" gong enough and win over moderates (which back her over him) and consolidate democratic voting bloc support, which demise Trump in record numbers.
 
Helmut's prediction originally made the rounds on some Breitbart affiliate site and went from there. Well, considering there's plenty of insane people voting for Trump in these primaries, you never know. ;D



Because midterm electorates don't favor democrats and incumbents, especially incumbent democrats, so midterm elections are far from "mandates", it was expected far before November. Obama never trailed Romney in national polling leading up to the election and the 47% comment buried Romney months before the election, we knew this leading up to election day. On top of all that, while unfavorability ratings don't necessarily translate to not being elected or vice-versa, because they are different things, and that's exactly my point. A survey of likely voters usually does give better insight into who gets elected, however, and that's what I was referencing here, there is your difference. This is data, not conjecture. Multiple polls in upcoming primary states demonstrate Trump, much like his buddy Christie, is vasty unpopular outside of his narrow base:

Unpopularity within his own party, in general

Vastly unpopular with Hispanics, etc.

74% unfavorability in NJ with minorities in general, as bad Christie's numbers



Hard to win a nomination if multiple, major voting blocks despise you.

No one in the party really liked Romney in 2012. Social conservatives rallied around Santorum while libertarians rallied around Paul. Romney won the nomination decisively. I think Trump will win the nomination outright without a brokered convention. Winning the general is the challenge.
 
Sanders just got totally rekt in South Carolina - 74/26. That's a much greater margin than most polls were predicting. This looks really bad for his campaign going into Super Tuesday, it's probably going to be a massacre.
 
Sanders just got totally rekt in South Carolina - 74/26. That's a much greater margin than most polls were predicting. This looks really bad for his campaign going into Super Tuesday, it's probably going to be a massacre.

It's Trump vs. Clinton in November. Lets make America great again!
 
I'm actually tempted to vote Trump.

If you're really going to vote for evil, why settle for the lesser?
 
I'm actually tempted to vote Trump.

If you're really going to vote for evil, why settle for the lesser?
Trump is probably the lesser one, he hasn't committed a crime. Clinton shouldn't even be running right now; she should be in a jail house. It makes no sense that she can do something similar to Snowden but Snowden gets demonized and has a bounty on his head by the US government.
 
Looking back at the Democratic primary in South Carolina, it seems that the average black voter is much more conservative than you'd be led to believe by progressive media.
 
Looking back at the Democratic primary in South Carolina, it seems that the average black voter is much more conservative than you'd be led to believe by progressive media.

Of course. Blacks voted for gay marriage bans by larger margins than whites everywhere they were on the ballot. Most are economic liberals, but more socially conservative.
 
Looking back at the Democratic primary in South Carolina, it seems that the average black voter is much more conservative than you'd be led to believe by progressive media.

Well yeah, South Carolina is a particularly red state. Red State Dems, particularly minority ones, are going to be a different shade of blue than ones from say, Ohio or the West coast.

Trump is probably the lesser one, he hasn't committed a crime. Clinton shouldn't even be running right now; she should be in a jail house. It makes no sense that she can do something similar to Snowden but Snowden gets demonized and has a bounty on his head by the US government.

You mean the inflated scandal that was never a scandal?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top