Joeyjoe9876
Wait, What!?!
- 25
- Posts
- 13
- Years
- Virginia, US
- Seen Aug 18, 2011
heh. doesn't sound too complex but I don't really like the idea of it. 2v2 is enough if you ask me
Quoted for truth.
I thought this was a terrible idea at first because I kinda' hate double battles, but then I realized the reason I hate double battles is because it's tough pairing just two Pokémon that compliment each other. I think 3v3 will work way better than doubles.
It'll also play more like traditional RPG's where you have full parties to work with. This makes me think we'll see more cleric types like Blissey in the new gen.
I wonder if we'll get a Triples Battle version of Plusle and Minun...
IMO it's a bit too crowded looking...
But it'll be fun for sure :D . We'll need many new combos. I just hope there isn't a triple gym leader, taking on three annoying Pokémon isn't fun.
Also how would that work in routes? You need three trainers to see you at the same time? Or like with the twins? hm...
Its the worst idea ever!!!!
Why... why would they make it double battles are epic no more needed.
Whats next pokebrawls?
lol pretty soon all siix pokemon will be fighting at the same time. lol
It should be quite good but I think it will also be very confusing, especially competitive battling