Imprisonment, I assume. I think that's what you get for breaking most laws.
Not life in prison? Not execution?
OK, I'll apologise for getting angry, but I don't appreciate people belittling the holocaust, and thinking that they could possibly understand the trauma behind rape without experiencing it themselves, all anyone can say for certain is that it's horrible.
That being said, on with the debate! If abortion were made illegal, then wouldn't women who accidentally fell down the stairs and landed on their bellies be guilty of manslaughter? If that foetus were to spontaneously miscarry, based on an uncontrollable lifestyle factor of the woman, say, she's too poor to eat properly. Would she be guilty of criminal neglect?
How dare me? How dare you decide that a human being doesn't have the right to live because of the way it's conceived? And yeah, I know what happened in the holocaust. A white nationalist slaughtered ten million people and justified it by dehumanizing them. Kind of like today how female nationalists justify the slaughter of innocent children by dehumanizing them. The trauma of a rape victim is no excuse to take an innocent life in the same way that the trauma of a serial killer's childhood doesn't give him the right to kill others. And I find it hilarious that you're questioning my integrity, MY INTEGRITY when you're sitting there justifying the deaths of innocent people! I could lower myself to your level and insult you but quite frankly what's the point? I have about as much respect for you as I have for those who say that the Jews deserved to die in the holocaust. You justify the murder of innocent people, end of story.
I never said that unborn children don't deserve to live, on the whole I don't feel comfortable with abortions but that doesn't matter; what makes me uncomfortable shouldn't be made law. Fact of the matter is an unborn child is incapable of surviving without direct connection to its mother, hence its mother should be allowed, under her discretion, to choose to have it aborted. It is still part of her body, she's allowed to do with it what she wishes.
I'm not going to beat around the bush. Abortion is murder, and murder should be punishable by death. So unless the two exceptions are the reasons for the abortion, they must pay with their lives. You may try to take the moral high ground because of this, but the problem is that you don't have the moral high ground. Like I said, you're defending murder.
You think you have the moral high ground huh? OK, I'm not the one defending the murder of what everybody agrees on to be actual, living people. They may have committed some serious crime, but that does
not facilitate killing them under a banner of "justice". If you support the death penalty, then anybody can say with exact certainty that you support murder. Me? Only some people think I support murder; a lot of them just believe that I respect the choices of other people. An eye for an eye leaves the world blind, a life for a life begets an endless cycle of murder.
Much like you trivialize the human life. Also, note that if you insult me again, I'll report you. I didn't want to enter this debate specifically because of angry morally challenged liberals screaming their hollow heads off because they lack a real argument.
I'm not the one comparing the death of one thing that not everybody agrees on as being alive, for often perfectly justifiable reasons, to the discriminate killing of millions of actual, living people for no reason.
Morally challenged? I'm sorry but I don't need a book written two thousand years ago by some bloke living in a tent in the desert to define how I live my life, my morals are my own, you're the one leaning on the crutch of religion and using it to justify your claims.
Bear in mind, I consider being compared to a Nazi a serious insult, furthermore you constantly say that anyone who doesn't agree with you doesn't value life, I'd say that's pretty damn insulting. So stop that before I report you.
