another dumb question

Analogue or digitial?

  • Analogue.

    Votes: 6 13.3%
  • Digital.

    Votes: 27 60.0%
  • Both.

    Votes: 12 26.7%

  • Total voters
    45
Sammy does digital, as it's easier to say and understand
 
I usually say the time digitally. I don't know why. It's just more specific to say "six fifty-three" rather than round it off and say analoguely "five to seven". I may sometimes use "quarter-to-five", but I'll always say "twelve thirty" as opposed to "half past twelve".
 
I say time in both the analogue and the digital way. The one I choose at the moment depends on convenience.
 
For me I've always been the digital kind of person, just used to it that way, and as others are saying it's much easier than analogue itself. I may, however, say it analogue if I just don't know what to say at random moments and I'm somewhat bored.
 
Both for me.

Though what really gets people is if I say it in military time (1:30 PM = 13:30, etc.). It even gets me confused sometimes, but I prefer military time to standard time.
 
bah analogue takes too much thinking, i'd be sitting there for about 6 seconds trying to math out the time. then i'd finally say it, realize i got it wrong, then take about 16 more seconds redoing math and correcting myself thus totally 'killing the mood/'
 
Online, I'd say it digitally. It's much quicker and it takes too much effort for me to type it out as analogue. D:

Offline, I'd say it as Daydream would do.
 
I only use analogue. I dunno if that's a British thing? But yeah I've always said 'five to,' 'ten past' etc. It's just normal, for me, I guess.
I think it is. I rarely hear people say the time in "digital style" I'd probably think it was weird if I heard somebody say it that way.

In case you didn't guess, I say the time in "analogue style" it's just the way I've always known it to be done.
 
I say it digitally. It's just more efficient to me.
 
Back
Top