pkmin3033
Guest
- 0
- Posts
As generally distasteful as explicit fanart usually is, I'm surprised Blizzard is so uptight about it. Any publicity is good publicity, as they say. When you've got an excited, dedicated fanbase before the game is even out, it seems almost like a disservice to reward that level of dedication with censoring. I'm not saying they should actively support or even acknowledge it - far from it, that would be extremely stupid considering the nature of it - but to actively censor it? It just seems a bit...well, strange.
I'm sorry, I'm not buying the "protecting our image" line. Nintendo are as family-oriented as they come, to the point that they frequently censor their games for Western releases, but nowhere do I see them doing anything to actively or effectively remove the obscene amounts of Pokemon fanart, and let me tell you, there is some seriously disturbing stuff online when it comes to Pokemon. It's the internet. You're fighting a losing battle here, Blizzard. You're just making yourself look silly. It's an admirable effort, but when every other company pretty much just ignores it, just doing that would have been enough.
Moving away from that particularly sticky subject...as for the copyright video thing, Jim Sterling found an amazing way around that. Well, that works with monetisation, but I'd think it'd apply for making actual videos as well, maybe? They've not cut out his recent Jimquisition on the Overwatch scene, anyway...by the way, don't watch that at work. Or if you're even remotely sensitive. Because it's Jim Sterling, with all that implies.
I'm sorry, I'm not buying the "protecting our image" line. Nintendo are as family-oriented as they come, to the point that they frequently censor their games for Western releases, but nowhere do I see them doing anything to actively or effectively remove the obscene amounts of Pokemon fanart, and let me tell you, there is some seriously disturbing stuff online when it comes to Pokemon. It's the internet. You're fighting a losing battle here, Blizzard. You're just making yourself look silly. It's an admirable effort, but when every other company pretty much just ignores it, just doing that would have been enough.
Moving away from that particularly sticky subject...as for the copyright video thing, Jim Sterling found an amazing way around that. Well, that works with monetisation, but I'd think it'd apply for making actual videos as well, maybe? They've not cut out his recent Jimquisition on the Overwatch scene, anyway...by the way, don't watch that at work. Or if you're even remotely sensitive. Because it's Jim Sterling, with all that implies.
Last edited: