Anti
return of the king
- 10,818
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- Kobe's Reality
- Seen Mar 6, 2022
your definition of "contributes something to match-ups" is still too narrow. i don't see how "sand cancels manaphy's leftovers!!" counts as a contribution but knocking off ferrothorn, whose passive recovery is so vital to its longevity, is not. and so it goes. anyway, azumarill puts in plenty of work against teams like latios/keldeo/landorus-t/raikou/mega/filler. what is switching into azumarill on that team, despite how "weak" it is? while the mega or filler will usually help in that department, it's certainly not a bad match-up. i don't see those shitass teams much anymore, but i'm just giving an idea of the sorts of match-ups where it can succeed. (this is why i find the claim that these pokes sacrifice significant offensive presence to be rather disingenuous: not every team is running mega venusaur or some ****.) i really wouldn't underestimate the utility of knock and priority (even prio as piss-weak as aqua jet) which can both be clutch in a number of unforeseeable situations. "i'd rather have slowbro" doesn't cut it when slowbro's typing simply affords it a different niche such that which one you'd rather have is entirely team-dependent, unless you're building around your av user in which case you're a bad player and should quit immediately. but some advantages of azumarill that immediately come to mind are that it doesn't bait pursuit/uturn/knock off like slowbro does, has priority and knock, hits harder, and has a far superior second stab. slowbro has advantages too (regen, scald, etc.), but saying one is "better" is silly. these are support pokes: how good they are depends upon the team around them. this is not that complicated.
re: match-up dependency, every pokemon as match-up dependent. literally every single one. charizard x is good vs. most playstyles in a very broad sense, but good luck against a weather offense or a random quagsire stall. hippowdon as the poster child for this is especially silly when almost every stall easily prevents it from setting hazards or can spin/defog them away easily, and even with an offense or more aggressive balance it's super easy to build against since it's so easy to overload (like in this replay. sand is barely a contribution in stall matches, certainly no more of one than, saying, av azum knocking off an amoonguss or something would be.
in short, no, they're not useless. you just use teams that are naturally very well prepared for these pokes, so of course they're wildly ineffective. but "good" and "bad" are more fluid in a few of these cases. (just to be clear, other cases like av amoonguss or something do not fall under this category since it's bad in every conceivable way lol.) you can cherrypick negatives and claim something is bad, but that doesn't make it so. there's nothing wrong with being a jack of all trades: just ask clefable. ;)
re: match-up dependency, every pokemon as match-up dependent. literally every single one. charizard x is good vs. most playstyles in a very broad sense, but good luck against a weather offense or a random quagsire stall. hippowdon as the poster child for this is especially silly when almost every stall easily prevents it from setting hazards or can spin/defog them away easily, and even with an offense or more aggressive balance it's super easy to build against since it's so easy to overload (like in this replay. sand is barely a contribution in stall matches, certainly no more of one than, saying, av azum knocking off an amoonguss or something would be.
in short, no, they're not useless. you just use teams that are naturally very well prepared for these pokes, so of course they're wildly ineffective. but "good" and "bad" are more fluid in a few of these cases. (just to be clear, other cases like av amoonguss or something do not fall under this category since it's bad in every conceivable way lol.) you can cherrypick negatives and claim something is bad, but that doesn't make it so. there's nothing wrong with being a jack of all trades: just ask clefable. ;)