Nica, it ain't your fault >_>
It's more of my mistake than any.
If the staff dealt more in the public eye, rather than behind a curtain...it'd be far easier to avoid making such conclusions. (In reference to the attitude about Steve)
Well at least Erica clarified things a bit. Half of the problem is that some of you staff members get upset at us for not knowing something, but you don't explain it all to us...so that leaves us to use our little creative minds to fill in the blanks...which leaves undesirable results sometimes. Really, I was expressing how I was feeling about it if the way Siggy had worded it was the truth. It seems to be a partial truth, but telling half a truth can sometimes do as much damage as a lie, so I try to avoid them when I can.
Really, if staff were more willing to say exactly why they oppose X, it might cut down on misinterpretations by members such as myself. o.o
ya gotta give me an A for effort, I try to fight for things that I feel are in the best interest of PC, but I can hardly do so effectively if I'm blind and deaf, so staff members need to be eyes and ears for all of us, or grant us the eyes and ears and hope our input will improve once we adjust to the new data. As the old programming adage goes. Garbage In, Garbage Out.