Autumne
who's ready for an ADVENTURE?
- 14
- Posts
- 7
- Years
- Seen Oct 20, 2018
Hiya folks. As a start, I'd like to say that this thread is meant to have both you share your theories about this topic, and also to discuss theories put forth by me or other posters. Either or is fine!
One of my favorite ways to think about what Pokemon are is to envision them as natural spirits, elemental, the natural forces of the world given a form. Instead of there being animals proper in this world that evolved from biology as we know it, their origination started more from energy that is give a sentient-to-semi-sentient form. Even after this point, they are able to channel and utilize more of that energy to power their behaviors and attacks.
This theory works well with the fact that Pokemon seem to follow very different rules than our worlds' animals do. For example:
1. they are more resilient to what would result in catastrophic damage to their physical bodies (such as being in the heart of an explosion, or exploding themselves)
2. they are able to produce more of their element than could conceivably be contained within their bodies (such as a Squirtle's water gun)
3. this would allow for an alternate means of reproduction that our purely biological one (and may also explain why humans are confused as to the mechanics of how it actually works). To further explain, perhaps different types of Pokemon energy polarities (understood as male and female) mix, creating a new center for energy to coalesce around, before this special shell breaks open (understood as an egg hatching), instead.
4. this also allows for new types of Pokemon to appear mirroring what exists in the world, which explains some more modern types of Pokemon. It also lets things continue to be murky as to 'which appeared first' in cases of 'did people in the Pokemon world mimic Unown for language, or do Unown mimic language?'
This also lines up somewhat with depiction of ancient cultures with Pokemon, where they're called 'magical creatures' rather than ... 'normal creatures'? They're seen as inherently linked to the magical-elemental forces of the world, which humans do not have easy access to themselves. Humans and normal plants are probably considered 'normal creatures'.
What do you think about this theory?
What are your theories about what Pokemon are?
One of my favorite ways to think about what Pokemon are is to envision them as natural spirits, elemental, the natural forces of the world given a form. Instead of there being animals proper in this world that evolved from biology as we know it, their origination started more from energy that is give a sentient-to-semi-sentient form. Even after this point, they are able to channel and utilize more of that energy to power their behaviors and attacks.
This theory works well with the fact that Pokemon seem to follow very different rules than our worlds' animals do. For example:
1. they are more resilient to what would result in catastrophic damage to their physical bodies (such as being in the heart of an explosion, or exploding themselves)
2. they are able to produce more of their element than could conceivably be contained within their bodies (such as a Squirtle's water gun)
3. this would allow for an alternate means of reproduction that our purely biological one (and may also explain why humans are confused as to the mechanics of how it actually works). To further explain, perhaps different types of Pokemon energy polarities (understood as male and female) mix, creating a new center for energy to coalesce around, before this special shell breaks open (understood as an egg hatching), instead.
4. this also allows for new types of Pokemon to appear mirroring what exists in the world, which explains some more modern types of Pokemon. It also lets things continue to be murky as to 'which appeared first' in cases of 'did people in the Pokemon world mimic Unown for language, or do Unown mimic language?'
This also lines up somewhat with depiction of ancient cultures with Pokemon, where they're called 'magical creatures' rather than ... 'normal creatures'? They're seen as inherently linked to the magical-elemental forces of the world, which humans do not have easy access to themselves. Humans and normal plants are probably considered 'normal creatures'.
What do you think about this theory?
What are your theories about what Pokemon are?