Circuit
[cd=font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; backgro
- 4,815
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- Berlin
- Seen Jan 6, 2021
Ok, so I've been kinda busy. And I reckon I've dug out some real good stuff. So prepare your bodies for a eye-opener!
Ok, so I've done a little bit of cross-game investigation here. Of course, all the Daemon's are known to us, or the information is at least available. I've identified them all, and looked at who is actually in this game. Matching that list with the clue "All the colors border on the truth..." Then GreenFlame immediately jumps to mind, no? But wait. There's more! When GreenFlame died the flames burned green. I don't know if this was unique for GreenFlame, but hey, this seems to fit a little too well to me. So many colour references, and also consider this as further evidence:
Need I say more? GreenFlame was in the previous game, and was a Daemon, and hosts the colour of the flames, should they burn a Daemon. All these hints point at him.
"I need you to return to the capital, Baldassare. Continue protecting the little monarch for the time being. I'll rejoin you when my work here is done."
So, this is pretty much certainly the necromancer's apprentice returning, to influence the game. Not sure what this means for now, but if he IS a player he needs to be identified and fast. If he's going to kill off innocents as a favour for the Necromancer, or the Warlock it means certain defeat for us Havenites.
I also have further proof that Sonata was indeed the Seer Ascendant. Here it comes:
At no point was it mentioned that Sonata had seen a physical being, of any kind. "It's a bit fuzzy." implies that Sonata is having trouble remembering it. What else do you often have trouble remembering? Dreams. Had we actually paid attention to the lack of a subject having been seen in this scene, we could have worked out that Sonata could potentially have been the SA. If you need evidence for what I just said, go and read my previous posts on this debate. I'm simply pointing out that the evidence for him being the SA is very large now.
What do I want to achieve by adding this evidence to the mix? I'm pointing a finger at Shak. He is still claiming the role of SA, despite the large amount of evidence weighing on Sonata's side here. The stubbornness of Shak seems very much suspicious, and is almost like a last attempt to avoid death. I don't think he is the most dangerous here, but I don't believe for a second he is on our side.
Now then. I bet you're wondering why I'm bringing this up again? Well I want to tell you all that we have only one case of anyone coming face-to-face with a werebeast and not being attacked/poisoned/recruited and so on. This is when MI encountered a beast. He stared it right in the eyes remember? In the original role post for the Marked, it says that this person is allied with the beasts, but doesn't know who they are. MI's behaviour suggests he didn't know who said beast was, but that beast MUST have known who MI was, not to have attacked him. Otherwise, why would the beasts have held back? This isn't the strongest evidence we have, but I find it strange that after MI encountered them with no consequence, suddenly the Marked is revealed to be fully developed. Remember, MI is the only person who has met the werebeasts with absolutely no further event occurring. If this isn't sus I don't know what is.
And there you have it folks. The people we need to keep our eyes on today are: Cosmic (GreenFlame), Shak and Ice (MI). But that's just a theory! Agame ninja theory! Thanks for listening! (Sorry not sorry for jumping on the GT reference bandwagon)
EDIT: HOLD UP. More evidence against Shak, I'm sorry, but this has to be said.
I've literally just thought about this. Bearing in mind that Naku usually posts the affiliation of everyone accurately (i.e. unaffiliated would show up as unaffiliated) then Sonata is certainly a Havenite. His role we won't know until the end, but tell me. What reason would someone working to help the innocents have to fake a role? Unless they are super salty with someone, which Sonata didn't appear to be, then it serves no purpose, only to throw away the game. It makes simply no sense that Sonata would have lied about his role. Shak, you're a liar about being the SA. You aren't a Havenite, admit it now.
Nakuzami's Hints said:Night is dark but hindsight is 20/20. Look back on last night to see the true colors.
Daemons are easier to identify than casters.
All these colors border on the truth, but a fire can show only so much.
Ok, so I've done a little bit of cross-game investigation here. Of course, all the Daemon's are known to us, or the information is at least available. I've identified them all, and looked at who is actually in this game. Matching that list with the clue "All the colors border on the truth..." Then GreenFlame immediately jumps to mind, no? But wait. There's more! When GreenFlame died the flames burned green. I don't know if this was unique for GreenFlame, but hey, this seems to fit a little too well to me. So many colour references, and also consider this as further evidence:
Day 1 Post said:Haven knows at least one of these creatures
Need I say more? GreenFlame was in the previous game, and was a Daemon, and hosts the colour of the flames, should they burn a Daemon. All these hints point at him.
"I need you to return to the capital, Baldassare. Continue protecting the little monarch for the time being. I'll rejoin you when my work here is done."
Original Post said:Baldassare bowed and backed away. "As you wish." A similar dark energy quickly enveloped the man. His form changed and he took to the skies."I need you to return to the capital, Baldassare. Continue protecting the little monarch for the time being. I'll rejoin you when my work here is done."
Baldassare bowed and backed away. "As you wish." A similar dark energy quickly enveloped the man. His form changed and he took to the skies.
Night 3 Post said:She was about to say something when they were all interrupted by the blaring of a bugle. She whirled around to see a large carriage surrounded by soldiers making its way into Haven. It bore the mark of the royal family.
...though he dressed like nobility
So, this is pretty much certainly the necromancer's apprentice returning, to influence the game. Not sure what this means for now, but if he IS a player he needs to be identified and fast. If he's going to kill off innocents as a favour for the Necromancer, or the Warlock it means certain defeat for us Havenites.
I also have further proof that Sonata was indeed the Seer Ascendant. Here it comes:
Day 3 Post said:Sonata: "I think I saw something last night. I'm not sure what, though . . . it's a bit fuzzy."
She stared at Sonata for a moment. She gave him a short nod. "Let me know if you recall anything useful."
At no point was it mentioned that Sonata had seen a physical being, of any kind. "It's a bit fuzzy." implies that Sonata is having trouble remembering it. What else do you often have trouble remembering? Dreams. Had we actually paid attention to the lack of a subject having been seen in this scene, we could have worked out that Sonata could potentially have been the SA. If you need evidence for what I just said, go and read my previous posts on this debate. I'm simply pointing out that the evidence for him being the SA is very large now.
What do I want to achieve by adding this evidence to the mix? I'm pointing a finger at Shak. He is still claiming the role of SA, despite the large amount of evidence weighing on Sonata's side here. The stubbornness of Shak seems very much suspicious, and is almost like a last attempt to avoid death. I don't think he is the most dangerous here, but I don't believe for a second he is on our side.
Day 2 Post said:They rolled down their sleeve, concealing the mark.
The transformation was complete.
Now then. I bet you're wondering why I'm bringing this up again? Well I want to tell you all that we have only one case of anyone coming face-to-face with a werebeast and not being attacked/poisoned/recruited and so on. This is when MI encountered a beast. He stared it right in the eyes remember? In the original role post for the Marked, it says that this person is allied with the beasts, but doesn't know who they are. MI's behaviour suggests he didn't know who said beast was, but that beast MUST have known who MI was, not to have attacked him. Otherwise, why would the beasts have held back? This isn't the strongest evidence we have, but I find it strange that after MI encountered them with no consequence, suddenly the Marked is revealed to be fully developed. Remember, MI is the only person who has met the werebeasts with absolutely no further event occurring. If this isn't sus I don't know what is.
And there you have it folks. The people we need to keep our eyes on today are: Cosmic (GreenFlame), Shak and Ice (MI). But that's just a theory! A
EDIT: HOLD UP. More evidence against Shak, I'm sorry, but this has to be said.
:/ I'm still not convinced that Sonata is the Warlock.
I don't understand why Neutrals would show up as Havenites. If they do, then that makes it even harder to guess which roles we've lost.
Lycan's really have their pick in terms of faking a role
I've literally just thought about this. Bearing in mind that Naku usually posts the affiliation of everyone accurately (i.e. unaffiliated would show up as unaffiliated) then Sonata is certainly a Havenite. His role we won't know until the end, but tell me. What reason would someone working to help the innocents have to fake a role? Unless they are super salty with someone, which Sonata didn't appear to be, then it serves no purpose, only to throw away the game. It makes simply no sense that Sonata would have lied about his role. Shak, you're a liar about being the SA. You aren't a Havenite, admit it now.