Alter Ego
that evil mod from hell
- 5,750
- Posts
- 19
- Years
- Age 37
- Touhou land, grazing danmaku all the way
- Seen Aug 8, 2010
Midsummer Knights is going to get updated again?
Wheeee! ^0^ *Runs into a wall*
...
I'm okay, honest. Seriously, that fic is the most under-appreciated one in this section. Well, with the possible exception of TurtleKing's anyway. Besides, I think it could use a review from someone who is capable of maintaining a more should I say professional approach to it? I can't put my finger on any particular reason, but reading that fic just awakens the fanboy inside me, which makes making proper in-depth comments a challenge. x3
It's not nearly as long a read as it looks like either.
Anyways, yeah, plagiarism bites. T_T Hanako is already on the case, though, I see. ^^
And...I enjoyed (re-)reading the reviewing guide. One thing, though: about the 'rating' reviews. I've seen a fair bit of cases where all the 'reviewer' says is something like:
or
I think we can all agree that these aren't really useful reviews by any stretch of imagination. I mean, number scales...sure, if you actually have some kind of criteria for the different ratings and motivate each number with properly detailed feedback, but I've seen a number of people give nothing but a number and possibly a few generic comments like in the first quote. Maybe emphasize that just a number isn't really a review? Okay, that's sort of covered in the shortie, but still...
That's the only thing I was missing there, really. :3
Wheeee! ^0^ *Runs into a wall*
...
I'm okay, honest. Seriously, that fic is the most under-appreciated one in this section. Well, with the possible exception of TurtleKing's anyway. Besides, I think it could use a review from someone who is capable of maintaining a more should I say professional approach to it? I can't put my finger on any particular reason, but reading that fic just awakens the fanboy inside me, which makes making proper in-depth comments a challenge. x3
It's not nearly as long a read as it looks like either.
Anyways, yeah, plagiarism bites. T_T Hanako is already on the case, though, I see. ^^
And...I enjoyed (re-)reading the reviewing guide. One thing, though: about the 'rating' reviews. I've seen a fair bit of cases where all the 'reviewer' says is something like:
Scary review example #1 said:Plot 7/10
Characters 8/10
I like the fanfic keep writing.
or
Scary review example #2 said:9/10 *Filler**Filler**Filler**Filler*
I think we can all agree that these aren't really useful reviews by any stretch of imagination. I mean, number scales...sure, if you actually have some kind of criteria for the different ratings and motivate each number with properly detailed feedback, but I've seen a number of people give nothing but a number and possibly a few generic comments like in the first quote. Maybe emphasize that just a number isn't really a review? Okay, that's sort of covered in the shortie, but still...
That's the only thing I was missing there, really. :3
Last edited: