Pinkie-Dawn
Vampire Waifu
- 9,525
- Posts
- 12
- Years
- Age 32
- California
- Seen Feb 16, 2021
In the early generations of Pokémon, the Gym Leader/E4 lineups suffered from lack of type diversity, in which Gym Leaders and Elite Four members had to use 2-3 Pokémon from the same family line, Pokémon not associated with their type, and Pokémon who already someone else's ace Pokémon. The remakes, which may include the upcoming ORAS titles, failed to fix these issues and only changed them for post-game purposes, which irritates me, because I wanted their lineups changed to be more diverse. Type diversity is an important feature for me, and a good type diversel lineup can either make or break the game. Now that we 721 Pokémon, my latest concern is Gym Leaders and Elite Four members using Pokémon who are already someone else's ace Pokémon. Korrina, for example, is a Fighting specialist who has a Lucario in her lineup, when it's suppose to be Maylene's ace Pokémon. Because of it, it only makes Maylene less special as a Fighting specialist. We want to make sure that all the ace Pokémon will stay exclusive to their respective Gym Leaders, Elite Four members, rivals, and villains. It's also important their ace Pokémon must also be Pokémon from their respective regions, excluding cross-gen evos.
These are the following Pokémon type specialists and other key important characters cannot use in their lineups due to being used as ace Pokémon:
I've gone through some various emotional breakdowns, even to the point where I feel like shedding a tear, whenever I try to convince people how important type diversity is and why we need more new Pokémon for certain types to prevent these problems, but they never seem to respond because they think it's not a problem, when it should be. Do you like the idea of type diversity in general, do you simply agree with the others who think it's not a big deal?
These are the following Pokémon type specialists and other key important characters cannot use in their lineups due to being used as ace Pokémon:
Spoiler:
Kanto Starters, Onix, Starmie, Raichu, Bellossom, Weezing, Alakazam, Rapidash, Rhyperior, Lapras, Machamp, Gengar, Dragonite, Johto starters, Noctowl, Scizor, Miltank, Mismagius, Hitmontop, Forretress, Mamoswine, Kingdra, Slowking, Crobat, Tyranitar, Hoenn starters, Probopass, Hariyama, Manetric, Torkoal, Slaking, Altaria, Lunatone, Solrock, Camerupt, Sharpedo, Milotic, Crawdaunt, Gardevoir, Absol, Dusknoir, Walrein, Salamence, Metagross, Sinnoh starters, Rampardos, Roserade, Lucario, Floatzel, Drifblim, Bastiodon, Froslass, Weavile, Electivire, Drapion, Hippowdon, Magmortar, Gallade, Garchomp, Unova starters, the Simis, Watchog, Levanny, Zebstrika, Excadrill, Swanna, Beartic, Haxorus, Stoutland, Scolipede, Jellicent, Chandelure, Bisharp, Gothitelle, Conkeldurr, Reshiram/Zekrom, Hydreigon, Volcarona, Kalos starters, Vivillion, Tyrantrum, Hawlucha, Gogoat, Heliolisk, Sylveon, Meowstic, Pyroar, Avalugg, Talonflame, Aegislash, Barbaricle, Noivern, Goodra
I've gone through some various emotional breakdowns, even to the point where I feel like shedding a tear, whenever I try to convince people how important type diversity is and why we need more new Pokémon for certain types to prevent these problems, but they never seem to respond because they think it's not a problem, when it should be. Do you like the idea of type diversity in general, do you simply agree with the others who think it's not a big deal?