My contention is with making an industry out of whether people live or die. What kind of screwed up system is that, anyway? I consider myself a capitalist at heart, but there are some limits, and included in those limits is anything relating to the life of a person. Police, healthcare, emergency response... it shouldn't just be one of these things that is government-controlled, it should be all of them. A person should not be sentenced to death because he can't afford to pay his doctors (and yes, this happens; while our health-care system currently treats immediate life-threatening injury, if you have a life-threatening disease and no insurance, you're out of luck).https://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.c...cans-divided-on-presidents-health-care-plans/
I apologize, I misspoke when I said nobody, but it is a very large group. Granted there is a slight upper hand for approval, but not everyone is informed on what a public option will do to the health care industry. Now I'm not saying that his whole plan isn't legitimate, but a public option has the potential to do more harm than good.
However, I won't try to derail this discussion any further. I get a bit worked up when people say that public health-care is a bad idea; my parents are both dying because of mistakes present in the current health-care system.