Last Rabbs' Fringe-Limbed Tree Frog Dies, Species Extinct

Pinkie-Dawn

Vampire Waifu
  • 9,525
    Posts
    12
    Years
    And then there were none.


    Toughie, the world's last Rabbs' fringe-limbed tree frog and a symbol of the extinction crisis, has died at his home in the Atlanta Botanical Garden.


    The famed frog's age is unknown, but he's at least 12 years old, and likely older, because he was an adult when collected in 2005.


    Mark Mandica, who worked with Toughie for seven years, says the frog's story isn't entirely unique. "A lot of attention had been paid to him in captivity, so he even has his own Wikipedia page," Mandica, head of the Amphibian Foundation, notes. "But there are plenty of other species out there that are disappearing, sometimes before we even knew that they were there."


    In fact, Toughie's own species (Ecnomiohyla rabborum) wasn't described until 2008, a few years after Toughie was found during a 2005 frog rescue mission by the Atlanta Botanical Garden and Zoo Atlanta. He was one of many frogs scientists raced to collect as the deadly chytrid fungus closed in on central Panama.


    "It was likened to just rescuing things from a burning house," Mandica says.

    The species occurred in a very small range, at an elevation where the fungus proved especially deadly. Field studies suggest up to 85 percent of all the amphibians on Toughie's home turf were wiped out. It's unlikely that any of his kind survived in the wild, where they were incredible climbers and also graceful gliders—toe webbing allowed them to soar from one tree to the next. (Learn about the increasing pace of extinctions.)


    Naming a Survivor


    Mandica's son, then a two-year-old, dubbed the last survivor Toughie. Naming animals isn't the norm among scientists, but the frog's popularity as the last of his kind meant that people (and the press) kept demanding a name—and Toughie stuck.


    Although he gave voice to the plight of endangered species, Toughie was silent for all the years he lived at the botanical garden, until one fateful morning in 2014 when Mandica captured the only existing example of the Rabbs' fringe-limbed tree frog's call.


    "I heard this weird call coming out of the frog [area], and I knew it had to be him, because I knew what all the other species sounded like. I was able to sneak in and record him on my phone." (Hear Toughie's call.)


    Photographing the Last of a Kind


    Photographer Joel Sartore recalls a curious, baseball-size creature with amazing eyes that actually hopped up onto his camera while being photographed for the Photo Ark project. Photo Ark aims to showcase our planet's incredible biodiversity and inspire people to help fight the extinction crisis while there is still time. So far, Sartore has photographed more than 6,000 species. Unfortunately, many others also represent the end of the line for their kind.


    "About once a year I photograph something that's the last of its kind or close to it," he says. "I get sad and angry because I can't imagine that this won't wake the world up and get people to care about extinction. I keep thinking, OK, this is the one. This animal's story is going to do it and get people to care more about extinction than about what's on TV.


    "They can't care if they don't know these animals," he adds. "They have to meet them and fall in love with them the way that I have and so many others have."


    Toughie, indeed, had lots of admirers. Last year his image was even projected onto St. Peter's Basilica, and his call played, so that the world could see and hear him.


    The frog met race car drivers and movie directors, Sartore recalls. "A lot of people were moved to tears when they saw him. When you have the very last of something it's a special deal."


    Now he's gone, and with him an entire species. And as large numbers of animals and plants continue to vanish, their loss increasingly compromises the healthy ecosystems necessary for everyone's survival—including our own. (Can extinct species ever be brought back?)


    "We're on track to lose half of all species by the end of the century," Sartore says. "And it's folly to think that we can lose half of everything else but that people will be just fine. It's not going to work that way. As these species go, so do we."

    Source: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/09/toughie-rabbs-fringe-limbed-tree-frog-dies-goes-extinct/

    I'm sure Exodrake will think this is no big deal because it's just natural selection doing its work due to the fungus infection, even if it means temporarily destroying an ecosystem without this sub-species of tree frog.
     
    I'm sure Exodrake will think this is no big deal because it's just natural selection doing its work due to the fungus infection, even if it means temporarily destroying an ecosystem without this sub-species of tree frog.
    I'm sure this is flame bait. :P

    ---

    That sucks, but at the end of the day it's just one species of frog that most people probably don't even know ever existed and never will. It'll be much worse when the pandas or tigers go extinct, so hopefully conservation efforts only get better. Not saying at all that we shouldn't care that the frog is gone.
     
    I'm sure this is flame bait. :P

    Not bait, because Exodrake's a smart/well-respected user that I'm sure other veterans will agree with.

    That sucks, but at the end of the day it's just one species of frog that most people probably don't even know ever existed and never will. It'll be much worse when the pandas or tigers go extinct, so hopefully conservation efforts only get better. Not saying at all that we shouldn't care that the frog is gone.

    I'd argue that the extinction of tigers will be much worse than pandas, because there's evidencing suggesting that pandas bring no benefits to China's ecosystem and they were already on their way to extinction due to its poor diet and reproduction.
     
    Not bait, because Exodrake's a smart/well-respected user that I'm sure other veterans will agree with.
    Not sure what that has to do with anything?

    I'd argue that the extinction of tigers will be much worse than pandas, because there's evidencing suggesting that pandas bring no benefits to China's ecosystem and they were already on their way to extinction due to its poor diet and reproduction.
    Well maybe. I didn't say this wasn't the case, though.
     
    Poor thing. Still that's a long life for a frog; he probably would have died years ago fungus invasion notwithstanding had he not been taken in by humans. They took very good care of him.

    It really begs the question; often members of an endangered species will be rereleased into the wild, often to a habitat they once flourished in. Why not keep them and breed them domestically in special enclosures made just for them as well as releasing a few of them? The animals tend to live longer under human care than they do in the wild, and while this won't work for every species it might for a few of them. Heck there's a variety of jellyfish exclusive to Japanese aquariums that doesn't appear in the wild at all. I guess I can see trying to maintain the nornal population of these animals to upkeep the natural order of things but...
     
    Poor thing. Still that's a long life for a frog; he probably would have died years ago fungus invasion notwithstanding had he not been taken in by humans. They took very good care of him.

    It really begs the question; often members of an endangered species will be rereleased into the wild, often to a habitat they once flourished in. Why not keep them and breed them domestically in special enclosures made just for them as well as releasing a few of them? The animals tend to live longer under human care than they do in the wild, and while this won't work for every species it might for a few of them. Heck there's a variety of jellyfish exclusive to Japanese aquariums that doesn't appear in the wild at all. I guess I can see trying to maintain the nornal population of these animals to upkeep the natural order of things but...

    Because animal activists would not allow them to despite how much of a benefit enclosures will save endangered animals (they consider it animal cruelty to display them outside of their natural habitat).
     
    Back
    Top