NFC - Nintendo Fan Club

Ehh I am too lazy to get my NP from the front room *will post later*

It was so wierd it was filled with ads of gaming publishers congrating NP on its 200th issue, and the editioral was by Regi :3

*was so excited to read this issue* XD
 
Blaze said:
I would like to see Nintendo make a division for making video games only, that way they could (and probably would) buy out out third parties like Namco and Sega.
Click to expand...
Me said:
I thought Games were all nintendo made? Games, and the systems to put them on...
Click to expand...

Make sense now? Blaze said He wants Nintendo to make a section just for games, but I thought games were all nintendo made.... They don't make anything but games and Systems, yet he said they make other things....
 
^I get it now. Sorry for responding to your post like that. ^^;;

Anyway body elese dissapointed that ToS scored 104 (or 114, I can't remember) on Nintendo's top 200? =/
 
Well Nintendo as a whole is a gaming console maker, I mean have a seperate division that way they can buy out gaming publishers and still make games for Xbox and Sony.

That way they double their profits
 
Well Nintendo as a whole is a gaming console maker, I mean have a seperate division that way they can buy out gaming publishers and still make games for Xbox and Sony.

That way they double their profits
Click to expand...

Oh. You're saying make games for the PS2 and Xbox, as well as GC? That'll never happen, because they're smarter than that. Sure, at first it would seem that way. But consider this:

If Mario, Zelda, and other Nintendo Characters' games were on other systems, what reason do Consumers(game buyers, in lay men's terms) have for buying Nintendo Systems, rather than Microsoft's system, or Sony's or whatever other console makers there may be in the future?
 
NO WAY.. but if every Megaman game came out in Nintendo consoles, it makes things easier for me too. But Nintendo should buy Sega, 'cause that company doesn't really do ANYTHING nowadays.

*brick'd by Shadow and Sonic*
 
Oh. So third-party game makers, like Sega and Namco and stuff would be bought by Nintendo, yet they would still make the same games as they always do(for all 3 systems). So then Nintendo could directly profit from sales of those games, is that what you're saying?

That would be a gamble Nintendo's not willing to make, though. They're doing good now, but imagine if they bought, say, Sonic Team(not all of Sega, just them). Then Sonic Team made a game for all 3 systems. And it flopped, Big Time. Now what? Nintendo spent its money on buying and funding Sonic Team and their new game, and they don't even make a profit from it. Then Nintendo's one step closer to the fall the Microsoft and Sony fanboys predicted....
 
True, and anyway, Sega's made Nintendo its share of their games. No real cause to buy it all out you know.
By the way, at the rate Sonic is loved by people, it can't flop.
 
I think it's sad that for the first time since SSBM came out, it wasn't on the top 10 selling GC games for the month. If only it lasted till Dec 05 then it would have been up for like 3-4 years.

And I was kind of shocked to see that the next Sonic game didn't look all that good. I mean Sony and Microsoft are going "we got the best graphics" and so on. I know Sonic is like Mario, you won't see killer graphics on their games. But still, for two that says they have killer graphics it doesn't look all that well.
 
Everyone loves great graphics (you got to be nuts if you don't). But it's not a big deal with most games. I mean you'll go "WOW look at them graphics *goes back to killing something/someone*" and that's how it is. When I played Call of Duty 2 on the 360 I didn't even think about the graphics till like 5-7 mins after playing it. And that's why I think Nintendo is doing the right thing in not going all out on graphics with the Rev and sticking to gameplay.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top