Eh, going to interject here.
First of all, in response to Jack O' Neill's statement, I don't believe that Jesus Christ was born on the twenty-fifth of December. On the other hand, I don't celebrate Christmas as a secular holiday. Honestly, it's a religious event, no matter which way you slice it. I don't care if the inspiration for making the 25th the season when the advent of Christ's birth was celebrated got started by missionaries who needed to put a substitute festival there to make the tribe of goat-slaughtering cannibal rapists they were preaching to happy, it is still a religious holiday for Christianity and should be viewed as such. Let the materialistic people of the rest of the world celebrate it as a holiday for getting gifts, let the atheists and agnostics celebrate the family togetherness and joy to the world. They are NOT celebrating Christmas. What they are celebrating differs from a holiday set to honor the birth of Christ so greatly that I think we should give it a different name. After all, I don't call Halloween 'all Hallow's Eve', which is where the name derives from. Personally, I think that either Christians or the rest of the world need to rename the 25th December holiday to reflect the difference in worldview that causes them to celebrate.
Oh... and I don't really think it's wise to call a sermon boring. Oatmeal is quite possibly the most boring food in the world, but it's extremely good for you, and keeps you from starving to death. I don't go to church to get excited, I go because I'm supposed to worship God. 0_o
Now, I don't ignore the secular side of Christmas. I just look on it as, primarily, a religious holiday and honor it as such. Prayer before presents, if you will.