Pokémon Chit-Chat

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought about selling all of my cards on eBay once, then decided not to. I feel that someday, these TV cards that I've got .. will go for more than $200 .. when Pokemon has gone way advanced and all that.
Then again, I could be wrong, and end up being stuck with all these cards and I'd have to burn them. >:
 
no, i asked if it was a possible way to throw them out, and in the captains-lugar.. is was this little door, with a little hole right down =>
 
Meh, Raichu .. you're not making too much sense. Its called spam, you could get Warns for that. >.< Its not a good thing.
 
wtf max, i am not lying..lol, what do you mean with that i not make much sense?
 
>.< You need to rephrase your sentences, and like I told you dude, try typing them with all the proper punctuation and everything.

Captain Luger wtf?
 
Meh, some people like me will call it spam, so you better start to write properly and everything. But anyway, I don't mind too much ..
 
Time to get back into the Pokemon discussion.
What do you think the next new released/announced Pokemon will be like?
 
I don't know. But if its like the new Pokemon I won't like it much atall. I thought that the last three Pokemon didn't look like Pokemon atall. But more like Digimon.
 
Digimon has nothing to do with Pokemon, except that they're both creature based. Creatures are bound to get similar:
~Pokemon~Beyblade~Digimon~
~Moltres~Dranzer~Birdramon~
~Suicune~Wolborg~Garuramon~
 
Not really. Manta looks like its evolved form, Perappu looks like a parrot that's unique, and the fox thing looks like a fox thing. Digimon doesn't have a red fox thing that looks too similar to it.
 
Supreme Edgeboy Max said:
Not really. Manta looks like its evolved form, Perappu looks like a parrot that's unique, and the fox thing looks like a fox thing. Digimon doesn't have a red fox thing that looks too similar to it.
Click to expand...
Your "Fox thing" looks totally like a sea otter to me~

I believe that's what it's supposed to be.
 
I don't really like the 4th gen Pokemon at all. They just look so... un-Pokemonish. They're all so colorful and have too much detail. Munchlax is probably the only exception.
 
Perappu looks more of a parrot that is unique. I'd say that the pokemon company might be getting lazy since they're coming up with real animals that are made into pokemon that we already know of
 
I think the Pokemon company should do less pre-evos. They should focus on making more regular pokemon. Pre-evos, although cute, really aren't that useful.
 
^ Agreed.

As for the whole deal about pokemon not looking like pokemon...I've honestly never looked at any pokemon and thought "Oh, that looks like a *insert other type of anime creature here*!" Not until someone else mentions it, anyways. :/

The only thing I have thought on my own, without being influenced by comments from others, is that Buizeru made me think "Sonic" because the eyes (and to some extent, the whole head) reminded me of the style that Sonic characters are drawn in, but other than that...
 
Paul said:
Your "Fox thing" looks totally like a sea otter to me~

I believe that's what it's supposed to be.
Click to expand...
I know its supposed to be some sort of an otter, but it looks like a fox to me. >_< I wonder what the new starters will be like ~ they better be better than R/S/E's starters. As a matter of fact, I find the R/S/E starters most weird looking of all the starters.
 
The R/S/E starters weren't brilliant by any means, IMO... and I didn't like how Mudkip/Marshtomp/Swampert had two types. o_o; And Blaziken... [? Haven't played the game in a long time...] Didn't seem quite... Pokémonish to me. o_o

I agree with Shiny_golem, too. Pre-evos aren't new anymore... o_o; They should have more Pokémon that don't evolve; so many Pokémon to evolve got painful...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top