• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Pokemon Roleplay Discussion

I've noticed that the general journey RPGs get full very quickly. The next time someone makes one save me a spot in the RPG ok? I'd like either Pikachu or Pachirisu as my starter.
 
Do you like Native Americans and survival RP's. If so, that is, in a nutshell, what my RP is about. Sword of Survival is a Pokemon-esque survival w/o technology to find out a mystery RP. It will have various plot twists.
 
Hey guys, im new to the forums, actually a returning member but i made a new account :) Anyway anyone starting up a rp soon, that you can inform me about?
 
Hey guys, im new to the forums, actually a returning member but i made a new account :) Anyway anyone starting up a rp soon, that you can inform me about?

Join my Sword of Survival RP. It is going to be a fun RP, with many plot twists. At least, that's the plan...
 
I'm gettin' really ticked at the mod.

9 days since I posted my rp.


No news on it.
 
-lounges around-

Why don't we have a thread for one-on-one RPs? Group RPs are great but they're awfully stuffy.
 
I like spur of the moment RP's , Slap down a topic and have people go from there
 
I like spur of the moment RP's , Slap down a topic and have people go from there

Got to disagree with you here. Without some sort of structure, an RP is most likely going to die quite quickly. That's not too say that an RP with a good structure will always succeed, but it will have a better chance of doing so.
 
Isn't that pretty much impossible in this forum where all new threads are filtered by mods? The plot needs to be there before your thread will be approved.

It does sound super attractive. Just give people a setting and let them do what they like. You gotta have good roleplayers first, though, or else it will lose inertia pretty quickly.
 
Keeping track of how many RPGS your in can be very hard if your in a lot of them. I think there should be a thread to help people keep track of all the RPGS there in. Like you post the name of each RPG your in, and beside each name post the date of the last time you posted in it. That is a good way to keep track of RPGS.
 
Hmm, I wasn't sure which one of these discussion threads to place this under. I decided to only place this here because of how things used to be... not saying that either eras are "better" I don't really mine, honestly <3

I just wanted to bring up an ever so popular concern that has populated the RP section. Presently in our little area we have two types of RPs: "Large company rps" that can sustain themselves and the smaller scaled ones that never last more than a week or a month. Basically the problem I am addressing is the "true lack" of rps that have a future... in other words development and even... possibly... a conclusion! *GASP* I said the unthinkable!

We all know this and right now you probablly wonder why I'm bringing this up at such an odd time? THE TIMING HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT <3 I just wanted to throw in my "two-cents" towards this issue.

As we have character building faqs (thanks to our lovely mod <3), I think that it might be beneficial if rp owners and rpers collabortated on creating a faq for owning an rp.

If you think this post is pointless, completely flawwed, or ect. please feel free to critisize. And if this post is in the wrong area... the mods can just play with it of course ;3

I'm also sorry for any grammatical errors made :/ I'm typing this post in the middle of the night and honestly don't intend to check before I pass out >.<
 
-lounges around-

Why don't we have a thread for one-on-one RPs? Group RPs are great but they're awfully stuffy.

Well, there are a lot more group-based roleplays than there are one-on-one's and creating a thread solely for organising the latter seems a little redundant, considering how little of them there are. Plus, I don't really see much of a difference between posting a one-on-one roleplay and a group roleplay, it's just that instead of filling up four or more spots, you're only looking to fill up one, which you can state in the title or description of the roleplay anyway.

Keeping track of how many RPGS your in can be very hard if your in a lot of them. I think there should be a thread to help people keep track of all the RPGS there in. Like you post the name of each RPG your in, and beside each name post the date of the last time you posted in it. That is a good way to keep track of RPGS.

I don't really feel that such a thread is necessary, since the average number of roleplays people participate in isn't really significant enough to warrant a separate thread for organising them all. Of course, I'm not saying that people can't be in as many roleplays as they want, but I think just keeping track of them in a personal document instead is much easier.

As we have character building faqs (thanks to our lovely mod <3), I think that it might be beneficial if rp owners and rpers collabortated on creating a faq for owning an rp.

That's not a bad idea and it's something that can be contributed to by a number of different roleplayers, but you'll need to find those with experience or at least insight to what they think can sustain a roleplay and see it come to a conclusion. I think finding people will be the hard part but it's a good prospect.
 
I think that it might be beneficial if rp owners and rpers collabortated on creating a faq for owning an rp.

God yes. I would really, really appreciate a guide like this. Just a straightforward FAQ for how to turn a good plot into a good roleplay. There was a time I thought the two were identical, but I was young and naive then!

As a matter of fact, there were plans to write a 'guide to being a GM'. Many moons ago Alter Ego suggested something about re-working the 'Treatise on Character Profiles' with input from as many people as possible, a merry and anarchic collaboration. The idea was well-recieved and a task group of Power Rangers was set up. Somehow, with our buoyant optimism, the project bloomed into something bigger: a series of guides to EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE - good characters, good posts, good plot writing, good roleplay etiquette. Looking back, the endaevor seemed fated to fail. As I remember it, only one of the guides was finished, and I don't see it up here. Alter Ego's 'Treatise' is still the only guide up on the forums. Kind of funny, really.

The moral of that story (if it has one) is that a collaboration with no one at the helm goes nowhere. Getting input from others is good, but there has to be just one person in charge of writing it.

Well, there are a lot more group-based roleplays than there are one-on-one's and creating a thread solely for organising the latter seems a little redundant, considering how little of them there are. Plus, I don't really see much of a difference between posting a one-on-one roleplay and a group roleplay, it's just that instead of filling up four or more spots, you're only looking to fill up one, which you can state in the title or description of the roleplay anyway.

To answer both your points, I think you may be mistaken that group roleplays and one-on-ones are at all similar. Group roleplays have a charted-out plot: things are planned out in advance. Certain events and scenarios are fated to happen. The outcome (good guys triumphing) is pretty much certain. When you sign-up for a group roleplay, your character fills a certain spot in the plot, and must have certain characteristics to be accepted. (IE, is a Pokemon trainer, or works for TR, or whatever.) The players expect the GM, who is the thread's creator, to guide them through the action.

One-on-one roleplays are largely character driven and unstructured. Many don't have a plot at all. Both roleplayers are in charge of the rp's events and have an equal responsibility to write interesting situations. A one-on-one roleplay without a plot wouldn't even be accepted by the mods - that's probably why there are so few of them.

Besides, one-on-ones can take place off of the forums, so there's no reason for the thread to look like a group roleplay (plot here, rules here, sign up here). All it has to be is an ad to other roleplayers that this person is looking for a one-on-one roleplay, has these expectations, would like to roleplay with this character, can be reached by IM, etc. That's what I mean by a one-on-one thread - an informal thread with a lounge-like atmosphere.
 
To answer both your points, I think you may be mistaken that group roleplays and one-on-ones are at all similar. Group roleplays have a charted-out plot: things are planned out in advance. Certain events and scenarios are fated to happen. The outcome (good guys triumphing) is pretty much certain. When you sign-up for a group roleplay, your character fills a certain spot in the plot, and must have certain characteristics to be accepted. (IE, is a Pokemon trainer, or works for TR, or whatever.) The players expect the GM, who is the thread's creator, to guide them through the action.

One-on-one roleplays are largely character driven and unstructured. Many don't have a plot at all. Both roleplayers are in charge of the rp's events and have an equal responsibility to write interesting situations. A one-on-one roleplay without a plot wouldn't even be accepted by the mods - that's probably why there are so few of them.

Besides, one-on-ones can take place off of the forums, so there's no reason for the thread to look like a group roleplay (plot here, rules here, sign up here). All it has to be is an ad to other roleplayers that this person is looking for a one-on-one roleplay, has these expectations, would like to roleplay with this character, can be reached by IM, etc. That's what I mean by a one-on-one thread - an informal thread with a lounge-like atmosphere.

Ah, my mistake on misinterpreting the similarities, or rather the differences of the two. I've witnessed only a few one-on-one roleplays and many of them ran much like how the group ones do here, so pardon my misguided assumptions. With that said however, I'm still unsure of the structure or form of this thread that you're proposing for one-on-one roleplays.

Are you proposing a single thread for all one-on-ones to organise themselves, where anyone can come in, discuss, find a partner and go off roleplaying? Because the problem I see with that is that there's already an informal lounge-like thread right here for such discussions. Having a separate thread for just one-on-ones would certainly make things less cluttered but then activity comes into question. How many people would actually use it? I don't know personally, so I'm just questioning whether its purpose warrants its existence.

Now if you're talking about creating separate threads for each individual one-on-one roleplay, the problem I see in that is that if you're simply using the thread for advertising and then abandon it once you find someone, brief them on the details and start roleplaying, then it doesn't serve much of a purpose after that. And if that's the case, you can simply use the roleplay lounge right here to do all that without cluttering up the forum. I can see them having a purpose in becoming more like standalone OOC threads where you can brief each other as you go along though, like a logbook of sorts, but I'm just wondering what your intentions were.

Of course, this is all from the perspective of conducting one-on-one roleplays off of the forum, not on. It's an interesting idea, don't get me wrong, it's just that some clarification on what you're actually proposing would help give us more of an idea on how it would work.
 
@Phanima I guess I'm proposing a seperate thread. You're right, a seperate thread for every request doesn't have much use. There's little enough traffic on PC that a single thread should accomodate everyone.

As for how many people would use it... Surely I'm not the only one interested? My experience with other forums (mostly Subeta and Neo) has been that one-on-ones are just as popular as group roleplays. Maybe it's different here because PC's group roleplays are of really good quality. Still, I'd be very surprised if there was no interest in a one-on-one thread.
 
Back
Top