antemortem
rest after tomorrow
- 7,460
- Posts
- 13
- Years
- Age 26
- he/they
- Los Angeles
- Seen Jun 15, 2022
"This Pride Month, I'm embracing 'rainbow capitalism'" — via The Washington Post
A Black gay man has a particular perspective in this; a subjugated queer voice of color is nuanced inofitself. Add to this the fact that Broome has more privileges than someone of trans/female experience since he more than likely passes as male/masculine, and the conversation's dynamics shift dramatically.
To suggest that "For every rainbow keychain, someone is out there fighting the good fight" is anything other than an exaggerated metric to appeal to the readers' pathos would be misguided. The number of organizations that contribute to the proliferation of Pride-related merchandising might be outnumbered by the number of people purchasing said merchandise, but visibility does not always equate to success. Representation on television or on Pride floats does not always mean that said representation is doing groundbreaking work to communicate safe messaging to queer communities, dismantle anti-transgender legislation, and so on.
Thoughts on rainbow capitalism, especially after the last couple of years of meditation on/development of the subject?
This is a purely opinion-based piece from columnist Brian Broome. It's important in conversations like this to understand how the authorial voice identifies (Broome is Black and identifies within the article as a gay man) because the intersection of identity informs experience and personal stake in a topic.My young friend says she has no use for Pride gatherings today. "It's overrun with straight people with their kids, and it's basically just a joke," she told me.
I understand what she's saying. But my younger friend was fortunate enough to come out and immediately find community. After some difficulty, her parents have grown to accept their daughter and her partner. While fantastic for her, this is also the weakness of her argument. She doesn't know what she doesn't know.
Besides, does she not see the wave of anti-LGBTQ sentiment and lawmaking washing over the country? Right now, we should be welcoming the support of however many straight people and companies want to give it — and however they want to give it. I understand that there are some in the queer community who believe the rainbow-ification of the movement has declawed it. But it's not a zero-sum game. For every rainbow keychain, someone is out there fighting the good fight.
In my youth, I could not have imagined a store selling merchandise celebrating what I had been led to believe was the biggest shame of my life. I wonder how a 13-year-old me would have reacted had I seen how positively normal it is to be gay — so normal that a department store is selling T-shirts about it. I wonder if those of us who marched in that parade would have held our heads up higher simply in the knowledge that we were not, as the hecklers said, sick and depraved.
I know queer people who are more "woke" will disagree. But if you never see yourself represented, you are most likely to believe what others say about you. Representation matters even if it comes in the form of a rainbow shirt on a dog. Somewhere that dog shirt is helping someone.
So, although I won't buy rainbow merchandise, I'm glad it's there assaulting my eyes in Target. Yes, it's capitalism at work, and it's soulless. But it's there. I remember what it was like to feel totally alone. Some other kid might see it and realize they aren't alone. And realize they are among others, many others. And that, somewhere, they can find acceptance.
A Black gay man has a particular perspective in this; a subjugated queer voice of color is nuanced inofitself. Add to this the fact that Broome has more privileges than someone of trans/female experience since he more than likely passes as male/masculine, and the conversation's dynamics shift dramatically.
To suggest that "For every rainbow keychain, someone is out there fighting the good fight" is anything other than an exaggerated metric to appeal to the readers' pathos would be misguided. The number of organizations that contribute to the proliferation of Pride-related merchandising might be outnumbered by the number of people purchasing said merchandise, but visibility does not always equate to success. Representation on television or on Pride floats does not always mean that said representation is doing groundbreaking work to communicate safe messaging to queer communities, dismantle anti-transgender legislation, and so on.
Thoughts on rainbow capitalism, especially after the last couple of years of meditation on/development of the subject?