You're made of fail tbh
Indeed. I'm sure you have the evidence to back that up, no?
That's not the arguement, it's that some people would rather have 150 amazing Pokémon and dislike the Hoenn/Sinnoh Pokémon which quite frankly have been surprisingly crappy compared to the original 251 IMO.
Yes, as a matter of fact that is part of the argument. The last "word" of that sentence completely makes the rest of it invalid for the purpose of this debate.
Budew more interesting than a Ditto? You've gotta be kidding me. Some of the new Pokémon are just so incredibly ugly and uninteresting, I'm gonna name a few, of course I don't know the names at the top of my head, so I'm gonna check out serebii:
Kricketot,
Budew,
Burmy, Wormadam, Combee, Cherubi, Shellos, Bronzor, Spiritomb
I mean, come on, I didn't even have to go through the Pokédex to find these ugly 'mon. I could just take some at random and see, they're just horrible.
No proof much? Once again, there is no point to your statement as it is your opinion and nothing more. My point was not that the pokemon now are better than the older ones. I'm saying that saying the older games had better pokemon based on an individuals opinion can not win a debate.
Pokémon Gold and Silver were my favourite games, those games were just incredible. If you havn't noticed, R/S was a pile of... well, suck compared to G/S. It isn't wierd that R/S sold way less than G/S compared to the gain of fandom Pokémon would have gotten those like 4 years between the games?
If you havent noticed, you show no proof. As for selling less, that can be explained by the fact that pokemon was old news by then and had more competition.
Huge evidence that the general Pokémon quality is going waaaay downhill:
Look at the games legendary trios, first we have the legendary birds: Zapdos, Articuno and Moltres, now, these are pretty darn awesome.
Once again, where is your proof? Then we have the legendary beasts of G/S/C, now these are just AMAZING. I personally just love Suicune and Raikou to bits!
Because? Then in R/S/E we have.... the regis? What the? First off, they are extremely ugly, secondly: They are not very creative, and... They're just horrible to the first 2 legendary trios.
In my opinion they are not ugly. How are the constructs based off of the different ages (ice, stone, and iron) less creative than a bunch of birds and dogs/cats/whatever.
Then, in Diamond/Pearl of course I hoped for a better trio, and we got it... not. The 3 silly apes. Seriously, 3 almost identical looking apes, all psychic.
Based off of will power, emotion, and knowledge. Fairly creative compared to ice/water, electric, and fire differentiating species. I don't think I have to say more about this, I dunno which trio is the worst, the regis or the apes, but they both suck supernaturally much.
Because, of course, whatever you think must be correct.
And of course we have the other legendaries, I mean come on, what the hell is Heatran, the volcano spider, compared to like Mewtwo?
A bipedal cat clone, how ingenious. Or like Palkia compared to Ho-Oh?
The being of space compared to another bird, now supposed to represent rainbows. A Silly joke, yeah, you heard me. I would have been okay with more Pokémon post 251 if they didn't make horrible ones. Some of the new Pokémon are awesome, like Milotic, but they are few and far between.
Once again, this has nothing to do with actual fact.
And, last but not least: Piplup is just a blue copy of Torchic, you havn't noticed?