Removable or non-removable batteries?

Do you prefer removable or non-removable battery?

  • Removable battery

    Votes: 9 81.8%
  • Non-removable

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • Wynaut both?

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11

Starry Windy

Everything will be Daijoubu.
  • 9,300
    Posts
    12
    Years
    Personally, I find that apparently, smartphones with non-removable batteries are more common nowadays, which caused my concerns when I wanted to buy a smartphone on the go due to the Note 7 debacle back in the day. Do you like it best if you have phones with non-removable batteries, or do you like it much better if you get the phone that have removable batteries? You can discuss it here.
     
    Clearly removable battery is the best for the end user, especially if you were buying a second hand phone because you can replace the battery with a fresh aftermarket battery that will last.

    The only benefit to buying a phone with a non-removable battery is the chance you'll get one with a shiny back shell. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
     
    My beloved Nexus 4 is dying a slow death and it bums me out that I can't just buy a new battery and switch the dead one out. Well, I could obviously just open up the back and try switching out the battery myself, but I'm a bit lazy... I don't really understand why they do it though, it's not consumer-friendly on the long run.
     
    Removable batteries FTW.
    If your battery begins showing some problems, you can replace it easily without being a technician or send the whole device back to the manufacturer.
    I don't care about a shiny back cover since it will attract fingerprints and scratch much more easily and most people (myself included) would hide it underneath a cover.
     
    For some reason, all of my removable battery phones have had a really worse battery life when compared to my non-removable battery phones. I dunno, I've never had any problems with non-remv bats, they do the job and they do it well. So personally, I'd go with them.
     
    Smartphones with removable batteries for sure.

    Suppose your phone (with non-removable battery) falls into water, you can't just open up its parts & let it dry up. Or if you have issues with your battery, in case of non-removable ones, you can't just pop in your surplus battery & carry on with your work. Also, when your phone hangs & buttons don't respond then, you can just remove it (removable battery), but in case of non-removable ones, you have to wait for the phone to respond.

    Pika Pika :chu:
     
    Given the choice, I doubt anyone wants less flexibility with their device. I've never used a phone with a non-removable battery though, so I don't know if there are any benefits to it. It might be true that they tend to last longer, like Svartulv said? My dad uses an iPhone and I feel like his phone tends to last a bit longer, but I think it also has a lot to do with how much time we spend on our phones and what we do on it, since I do way more browsing, watching videos and playing games.
     
    Removable, it can extend the lifetime of a phone when the battery isn't as powerful as it used to be. You can also bring extra batteries for more usage time!

    It's a shame Apple won't do that to their devices.
     
    In the past, I'd have said removable batteries.

    In practice, though? That just makes it a bit too easy to get a replacement battery that isn't up to spec.

    People tend to be very cheap.

    A non-removable battery might be a bit tough for those that know their way around hardware maintenance and know what to look for in a good battery, but it also makes the phone pretty much idiot-proof. This isn't too much of a concern, with current batteries usually guaranteed for at least 500, usually 800 to 1000 cycles before the battery runtime is noticeable shorter (<70~<80%) than new.

    A new battery replacement can be done anyway in a service centre if you must, and for a small fee if it's out of warranty. That's how things should be.

    Was burned (not literally, thankfully) by shoddy batteries that die out of nowhere
     
    I really have no preference. My mom used her iPhone 4S for many years and never had any issues with the battery. I don't really know anyone bothered by it. My own phone is about to be one year old in May and the battery is still going strong for it ^-^ despite that I use it a ton.
     
    As someone whose Xbox360 controller's rechargeable battery pack has been lost and is reliant on AA batteries, I have to say being able to recharge something (and use it at the same time) is just a really good thing.

    Although video game controllers are large, odd-shaped devices compared to smartphones, I do think I'd trade some thin-ness for the option to swap in batteries instead of having to buy a charger case. Especially as thin-ness is now basically just an excuse to remove features (no guessing which company I'm talking about there).
     
    Back
    Top