Dawn
[span="font-size:180%;font-weight:900;color:#a568f
- 4,594
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- She/Her
- East Coast, USA
- Seen Nov 22, 2023
I always found it strange why a man can go topless in public but a woman cannot.
I remember being told it is because a female's topless body is sexually attractive to men and society wants to mitigate this in public so children and such aren't offended.
Well woman can also be sexually attracted to a man's topless body so that logic seems moot to me.
It's not moot. It just exposes a double standard. I mean... considering guys have breasts too if anything nobody should be walking around topless according to the logic.
One could say girls find a guy's chest attractive for a different reason than a guy find's a girl's chest attractive and that's why...
But... Meh...
That would be what I would call trolling real life.Yes, also, I think everyone should have the right to go out naked.
O god. Guys pants off='s exposure of male sex organs. Girls shirts off does not = exposure of female sex organs. Sure, breasts are considered reproductive organs
Fatal contradiction encountered.
So breastfeeding them at a younger age is just fine? I'm not disagreeing with your point, but I don't see what difference it makes when many kids start off getting fed from breasts. Plus, frankly, depending on gender, they will wind up having them or seeing them at some point anyway. And it's not like they'll induce nightmares or psychological issues the way exposing them to, say, Gears of War would.
Breastfeeding generally is done discretely and exposes significantly less than jogging around with nothing on your torso. Very different.
I'm just wondering how that will happen. Something like a nipple won't suddenly make a person want to kidnap a woman. As far as I know, most people who would actually commit acts like those would commit it regardless of what the person is wearing.
The sudden exposure and change is pretty much bound to increase the risk. You can't simply trust people to act the way you want when you're handing them a motive to do the opposite. Just saying, it's not practical at all to assume everyone is not going to be influenced by sudden exposure of breasts.
Should not having "class" be illegal?
Yes, not having any "class" should be illegal. Less you intend to play /b/ in real life. There needs to be some minimum limits set to keep things orderly.
Exactly. And people would freak out if the laws on that were changed now. But if it wasn't a law in the first place, it would be no different or more distracting than seeing someones face.
That's just the way the cookie crumbles... /shrug
P.S. I find a good pair of clothes quite attractive thank you very much topless guys