• Please note that this section is for questions regarding the forum itself - it is not for fan game-related questions. If you have a question about a fan game, ask in the appropriate thread.

  • Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • It's time to vote for your favorite Pokémon Battle Revolution protagonist in our new weekly protagonist poll! Click here to cast your vote and let us know which PBR protagonist you like most.
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Signature Rules & Review Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Massacre. - yes, your signature is fine like that.
 
Just checking to make sure that I'm fine.
 
Repaired mine.

Change summary: Inserted fixed image as CSS background property and put random image inside the same CSS div over the top of the main image. When randimg.net fails to load (or if you find it so annoying or slowing to your browser that you use Adblock Plus or another addon to block images from that site) it will auto failover to the static image as background. I think I used the smallest image in my pile as the replacement, but if not, let me know please. I intend to edit the pile anyways when the site comes back up to remove images with transparent BGs so they aren't interfering with each other. (We don't want that nasty overlay effect do we?)

Please discuss this with other staff before you reject the idea, but if it somehow exceeds the limits, let me know. I may just auto failover to a tiny icon instead of a whole image if the size total is an issue.

Repaired again, when image loaded, it displaced text element...which was undesirable.

Repaired stack of images, removing images with transparent BG.
 
Last edited:
I'm a little bit afraid that I might be over the limits.
...well, am I ?
 
These new rules are.... kinda dumb. I mean what is the point of not letting you fill the whole signature bar with css on the width, i mean i understand with the height... But the width only fills the width that's already there.
 
Karpman - it's fine.
Pachy - my internet is bleh and dislikes trying to load your signature often... =/ Instances where it did load it appeared to be fine though. *shrugs*
560cool. - yes, it's just a bit too tall (if you say removed the line spacing it may fit though!). Width-wise it is fine though.
 
I fixed some spaces. I suppose it's fine now ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top