I don't think so. Remakes will always sell. Sinnoh, Unova, Kanto and Johto all still need a 3D overworld version of the region.I doubt they are just going to stop. They still make a ton of money of both remakes and new games. RBY, the newer player complained because it was too complicated. VC is also a lot cheaper than remakes or newer games. They older games are limited. And they can't fix bugs and glitches. The main reason the VC games were released was for the 20th ann.
ORAS sold nearly 10 million copies, 3 million on release, while re released didn't even make it to 2 million.
So if Game Freak just stopped doing them altogether (like some people in this thread are suggesting) what would happen to the series? Remakes have been a staple of Pokemon since almost its very origin and personally I can't see GF getting rid of them.
As much as I'd love a Sinnoh remake, I'm more convinced that there wont be one. I'll admit I've given it a lot of thought and still think it's a possibility, just as of now it doesn't seem all that likely.
From a marketing perspective then I'd say yes there would be, past remakes have gone on to sell over 10 million units per remake making the whole remake concept a very lucrative market. Taking remakes out of the picture does significantly reduce the turnover for the franchise and spin-offs don't even match the sales figures that remakes can accumulate. On the other hand I just can't see any other valid reason for them to remake these games that are still fairly modern and can be connected to the later games. With RSE we had a few issues such as dying batteries, outdated features and of course connectivity issues. Diamond & Pearl has many features that give it a fresh feel and there isn't much of a problem when transferring to later generations. It is fun to speculate about hints towards upcoming games and obviously there is always the possibility as Game Freak are quite unpredictable. Diamond Head & Pearl Harbour is interesting though.
I agree with the idea, but they did make OR/AS when they could easily have re-released R/S on Virtual Console instead.
Nope, and it never will be. With Pokémon games on the VC now a reality, the era of remakes is over. Why put time and money into a remake that will never sell as well as a main pair or even third version when you could just re-release the original for next to nothing and make an easy profit? All three of the existing remakes underperformed in sales, while the VC RBY was a smash success.
DPP will much more likely get a VC re-release on the NX, along with RSE, FRLG, HGSS, BW, and B2W2. (GSC will probably get a 3DS re-release next year, or so.)
So why do you think we could get D/P on the virtual console? I don't know much, but if it can't emulate GBA I don't think it could emulate DS either.Actually, they couldn't have. The 3DS VC can't handle GBA games.
The 3DS doesn't need to emulate DS when it can play it natively.
Thing I just thought about, though, is that if they did that, you would be strictly limited to local wireless trades and battles.
Re-releasing them as VC when you couldn't even do anything with them over Wi-Fi wouldn't be so good, I'd rather have them remade on 3DS or whatever newer handheld would be out then.
Actually, RS sold 16.22 million, while ORAS sold 11.84 million, and that's despite RS being, at one time, the worst-selling main paired games. The gaps are even larger when you compare RB vs FRLG and GS vs HGSS.
And, the low cost of VC releases is exactly why they're an easier profit than remakes. GF doesn't have to spend hardly anything on them, which makes them an almost guaranteed profit.
Seeing as remakes didn't exist until Gen 3, I think the franchise will do just fine. ;) Do you think that Gens 2 and 5 "suffered" for not having any remakes of old games like Gens 3, 4, and 6? Many people would say the exact opposite.
HgSs were 2009 in Japan. Japan has had them every five years since 2004. Now with games releasing in the same year WW then we could get them by 2019. But then again DP came out four years (2006) after RS (2002), compared to RG (1996), GS (1999), and RS (2002...and in 2016 SM! xD) which were all 3 years apart (Japan again), so the remakes if they happen could last another year to reflect that. Of course the remakes now are happening 2 years more after the originals compared to the earlier remakes. RG and FrLg were 8 years apart, GS and HgSs were 10 years apart, and RS and OrAs were 12 years apart. If that continues then 2020 would be the year for DP remakes, it also fits the six year after mentioned before.Shinnoh will be remade in 2018, 2019 or 2020.
Remakes fall in a 4 to 6 year timeframe from the last remake.
FR/LG: https://pokemon.wikia.com/wiki/Pokémon_FireRed_and_LeafGreen_Version Released 2004
HG/SS: https://pokemon.wikia.com/wiki/Pokémon_HeartGold_and_SoulSilver_Version Released 2010
OR/AS: https://pokemon.wikia.com/wiki/Pokémon_Omega_Ruby_and_Alpha_Sapphire: Released 2014
I'm be willing to guess that 2019 will have Shinnoh Remakes. Probably for the next system as already pointed out.
I think the rottom dex is half a nod to Shinnoh, a quarter of a nod to the Devon Scientist in Hoenn, and another quarter of a nod to Rottom as a popular pokemon.
The 3DS doesn't need to emulate DS when it can play it natively.
Thing I just thought about, though, is that if they did that, you would be strictly limited to local wireless trades and battles.
Re-releasing them as VC when you couldn't even do anything with them over Wi-Fi wouldn't be so good, I'd rather have them remade on 3DS or whatever newer handheld would be out then.
You are adding some 300+ pokemon, mega evolution, better graphics, more moves/items, and a slightly longer storyline. Plenty of people would buy them. I've seen reasonable sales for games that are just a graphics increase of older games.
So why do you think we could get D/P on the virtual console? I don't know much, but if it can't emulate GBA I don't think it could emulate DS either.
So? FRLG and HGSS don't have any of those things either. Heck, FRLG have even less than DPP. Does that mean we need new Gen 1 and 2 remakes, too? Where do you draw the line?
but ORAS did. The remakes will get better and better as new features are added to new games.
That's kind of a "Duh," and it proves my point. :rolleyes2: Even remakes themselves are going to eventually become "obsolete" and "outdated," so do you just keep re-remaking and re-re-remaking ad infinitum just so everything can be kept "up to date"?
Remember that FRLG are older and more obsolete than DPP, so based on the arguments people have been giving in favor of remakes, Kanto is next in line, not Sinnoh. And, when Sinnoh's ready for remakes, Kanto/Johto shouldn't be far behind, as HGSS are only slightly younger than DPP. And, after that, it's Unova, which will require TWO remakes (for both BW and B2W2), and then Kalos, and then Hoenn again, and then Alola, and then Kanto #3, and so on. It'll just keep going on and on in an endless cycle of remakes and re-remakes, all the while new games get marginalized and shoved into the background (see XY).
Honestly, while I think most people prefer remakes, if they release a VC game, that's fine. I think just being able to explore the region and fight the gym leaders is cool.
I'd just love an actual remake, so I'm hoping they go that route. After they've remade it once, though, I agree they should just re-release the original on VC. There's a point at which we should focus on making new games, not just continually remake old ones over and over.