The Dragon's Den V.4

Status
Not open for further replies.
eh just make any improvement to any dragon type pokemon (including stats moves or even better appearances you could think of) just anything.
Frankly i think Dragonite should be blue, that would make more sense.
 
I would edit one of the new Dragon Pokémon.

Spoiler:
 
Spoiler:


I don't know what i would improve with any of them, maybe tweak Dialga's Shiny coloration a bit but that's about all that I would do off hand right now.
 
As for improving dragons, I'd have to say that Altaria, Flygon, and Kingdra have rather lackluster stats (but can shine in battle given they've been put into the right hands). Other than that, I'd say the dragons are okay for now. Although, I'm unsure of Generation V mainly because I'm avoiding info on it.
 
I am with silhouette on the gen. V. They have made enough pokemon games and should have stopped making new ones at platinum. HS/SS are good, but they dont count as games that shouldn't have been made because they're remakes of a good original.

On topic... Salamence would look cool with four smaller wings rather than those two triangles it has now.
 
As for improving dragons, I'd have to say that Altaria, Flygon, and Kingdra have rather lackluster stats (but can shine in battle given they've been put into the right hands). Other than that, I'd say the dragons are okay for now. Although, I'm unsure of Generation V mainly because I'm avoiding info on it.

I don't think Pokémon need different stats. Not all dragons need to be awesome in battle, you need weaker ones too. I'm not saying weak, just weaker.
Plus, you know an awesome trainer by the fact that he can win using weaker Pokémon.

I am with silhouette on the gen. V. They have made enough pokemon games and should have stopped making new ones at platinum. HS/SS are good, but they dont count as games that shouldn't have been made because they're remakes of a good original.

On topic... Salamence would look cool with four smaller wings rather than those two triangles it has now.

I think Silhouette is just avoiding spoilers. Let's not bring the 'New Pokémon are evil' discussion here. (Also, the main games are ultimate canon. Face it, haha.)
I wouldn't call Salamence's wings triangles, they're a bit... Arclike. But four wings would really rock.
 
your all right, i can't think of any other changes since i'm not exactly a stats expert, and, most dragon types are good as they are, i can only say this.
Bagon's appearance should be different, dunno how, i bet the gamefreak dudes could think of something.
 
Hmmm...Altaria and Flygon aren't weak...they're just not pseudo-legendarys like most dragons....and have more than 1 weakness, unlike Kingdra.

I personally would change some tiny things:

- Dragonite's Shiny form should be blue....or if not blue, something else...but that current green colouring is hideous.
- Not really a dragon pokemon....but I'd stop Kanghaskhan from learning Outrage. I think that move should be a dragon-only move (so I'd stop a lot of pokemon who can learn it via tutor too), and that the only pokemon that can learn it by level-up should be Dragonite and it's family. Although Rayquaza is fine as it's the only legendary to do so.

That's about it tbh...


Oh, and new thing from me:

If you're all interested, we shall have another vote on any disputed dragons!

Here's the guide on how it's being done:

Code:
- First, you must make a substantial argument (not just "it learns a dragon move") for/against your pokemon being a dragon. 
- Next, via vm, get people to support you. If they give their support, take down their username.
- Finally, pm your argument to me, with the names of the supporters of your argument at the bottom. Causes with the most supporters will be voted upon. The maximum number of pokemon to be voted on at the same time will be 3. I'll then post the arguments into here, and declare voting open.

If you're all opposed to the whole "get supporters part", then I'll just judge how substantial your argument it is, and put up any disputed pokemon (obviously, the masses will decide overall)
 
Great idea, but, i don't think there are any other dragon types to add.
Or atleast i can't think of any.
 
poor you, how long have you been planning that list now?
for over 20 pages, man you MUST be a busy guy.
How long will you be able to stay online for tkallab?
 
Haha...Tyranitar.....I've seen people claim that's not a dragon...

Like I said, this a free-for-all, if nobody cares, doesn't happen, simple as.
 
Oh right, well i don't really care that much although
[PokeCommunity.com] The Dragon's Den V.4
does strike a resmbalence to a *bulbagarden.net image removed*, but, i think it's more of a dinosaur, not a *bulbagarden.net image removed*.
 
If we were to start a discussion on Tyranitar, we'd be more active, I think. Real discussions are always fun to me, haha. It'd help me to get myself a nice list. Where's draggy when you need him?

Anyway, I'll just request that Tyranitar be voted upon. I'd like to see him being considered a dragon in this club if he weren't a pseudo-legendary. More reasons'll follow, I started the list!
 
Warning! Large Spoiler Alert!

Spoiler:


And this is why I believe that Milotic should be a dragon.

*Bows* :D



EDIT: Thought of another reason; Milotic also breeds with the dragon group. Charizard and Gyarados do as well, and they are considered dragons, so why not Milotic? :)
 
Last edited:
Cool. Get that list, and either pm it to me, or post it here and I'll stick it into my OP at the beginning of this thread when I put all the info into that post.

It's really great that you're willing to do these lists...I know I couldn't be bothered.

EDIT: Okay, Doonerz, I thought one of you would bring that up....yes, you have a point (both Gyarados and Milotic are sea serpents, and are often considered to be counterparts). Try to think up more reasons to vote Milotic in, so you can convince other people you're right.
 
Hmmmm Dooonerz does strike a good point, yep, i think i'll support his idea:)
I now support Dooonerz's idea of Milotic being a dragon (although i still have a few tiny doubts)
 
In my opinion Milotic is an eel whereas Gyarados and Rayquaza are Chinese dragons, but Milotic could also be a sea serpent.
Personally, I'd sooner compare Milotic with Dragonair than Rayquaza, because they Milotic looks a lot like Dragonair in body structure and habitat, as well as elegance. I'm not saying I support Milotic to be in this club, but I do support he be voted upon.
List time!
 
I would like to say that I support the idea of Milotic being a dragon 100%

Also, I made some userbars :)
[PokeCommunity.com] The Dragon's Den V.4

[PokeCommunity.com] The Dragon's Den V.4

[PokeCommunity.com] The Dragon's Den V.4
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top