Oh wow, I cant hear your 'better' idea's over the loud contradictions and obnoxiousness.
Lets analyse the lucky three absolutely awful idea's in your post..
1) Game idea's based on competitive battling tiers. This is the main cancer killing fun in competitive battling. Pokemon tiers are created by fans, Game Freak does not develop new Pokemon playing fortune teller about which Pokemon its fanbase will find popular besides movie featured Pokemon. Just because the fanbase has taken a liking to dragon's, doesn't mean you should make less, its the opposite way round in business! Fail idea is illogical.
2) 3D is nothing more than an aesthetic change to the graphics. You do not need 3D graphics to make a good game. The top down view has been a classic Pokemon staple, and considering there is a programmable camera present in D/P/P/HG/SS, but not implemented for player use in the final product, suggests they wish to stay that way. Also, this bust you mention, are you suggesting that the next Pokemon, if its not 3D, it will not sell? Do you think its target demographic, kids in japan, compared to our age, are going to turn around and say "I dont want that Pokemon game, it is not 3D"? Very wrong.
3) Again with the bust statement. If, like it has been announced, Generation V comes out on original DS hardware, improving the online aspect is limited. What amuses me is, you don't even elaborate as to what 'better online' is, yet when some one expresses an opinion on your idea's, that person is wrong, and instantly cannot better your creative wisdom, where ever that may be. Also lol @ double bust, if it has no 3D, no 'better online', I still bet you will lap it on day one.
So yeah, over all, just to return the favour to the majority of the users you've been rude to here, your idea's are awful, "deal with it".