- 54
- Posts
- 11
- Years
- Seen Jul 19, 2018
Yes:
Archeops: I've always enjoyed watching it move its wings rapidly in battle. I'm sure I would really enjoy seeing it in 3-d.
Any form of rotom: They have this interesting bold outline that I feel would look nice in 3-d.
Infernape: Well.. This is quite obvious. The flames look pretty nice in 2-d. In 3-d they will look extraordinary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No:
Sunfisk: Okay.... this is one ugly looking pokemon. also it is very 'flat'. A flat pokemon to me would not look so good in 3-d.
Relicanth: This pokemon always looked weird to me. Also it seemed to be at a very strange angle. It doesn't have much of a design. Overall to me, it will give me nothing interesting in 3-d compared to the plenty of other pokemon who would look just fine in 3-d.
Druddigon: I have nothing against this pokemon. But it doesn't do me any good. It's standing in an awkward position (to me) and in 3-d it would not look good.
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/567.gif)
Archeops: I've always enjoyed watching it move its wings rapidly in battle. I'm sure I would really enjoy seeing it in 3-d.
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/479-wash.gif)
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/479-heat.gif)
Any form of rotom: They have this interesting bold outline that I feel would look nice in 3-d.
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/392.gif)
Infernape: Well.. This is quite obvious. The flames look pretty nice in 2-d. In 3-d they will look extraordinary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No:
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/618.gif)
Sunfisk: Okay.... this is one ugly looking pokemon. also it is very 'flat'. A flat pokemon to me would not look so good in 3-d.
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/369f.gif)
Relicanth: This pokemon always looked weird to me. Also it seemed to be at a very strange angle. It doesn't have much of a design. Overall to me, it will give me nothing interesting in 3-d compared to the plenty of other pokemon who would look just fine in 3-d.
![[PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No [PokeCommunity.com] Top 3 3D Old Pokemon: Yes VS No](https://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/621.gif)
Druddigon: I have nothing against this pokemon. But it doesn't do me any good. It's standing in an awkward position (to me) and in 3-d it would not look good.