Watch out for Ghosts! (Read the First Post!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
23.

I think a Grass/Fire-type or another Grass/Water Pokémon would be really interesting! Not sure what kind of species it would be, but I always liked the Lotad-line for its unique typing alone. Heck, I think the "Lonefire Blossom" Yu-Gi-Oh card might set a good example for a potential Grass/Fire Pokémon! :D
 
25

I don't think there's a specific type combination I want to see, but I agree ghost/normal to be interesting as combination, but I have no idea what I should imagine as ghost/normal Pokémon.

Revise Librarian said:
I think a Grass/Fire-type or another Grass/Water Pokémon would be really interesting! Not sure what kind of species it would be, but I always liked the Lotad-line for its unique typing alone. Heck, I think the "Lonefire Blossom" Yu-Gi-Oh card might set a good example for a potential Grass/Fire Pokémon! :D
Click to expand...

Grass/fire should be a pepper.
 
26

I imagine that a Ghost/Normal type would be something like a stylized classic sheet ghost. Like the Halloween costume where all you do is wear a white sheet over your head with holes cut out for your eyes.
 
27.

Lycanthropy said:
Grass/fire should be a pepper.
Click to expand...

I think this would make a really fun Pokémon design:

[PokeCommunity.com] Watch out for Ghosts! (Read the First Post!)


xD
 
28.

I want a Bug/Normal type like I think that would be cute. also wouldn't that nullify Fighting type as a weakness?

Also:
[PokeCommunity.com] Watch out for Ghosts! (Read the First Post!)
 
29

Apparently Bug-type would neutralize Normal's Fighting weakness so you're right on that one. Sadly it'll still have all three of Bug's usual weaknesses intact, so not as beneficial as you think.
 
30

As fighting resists bug too, you don't really wanted to use bug moves anyway and STAB normal type moves can be beneficial, along with a ghost type resistance. Yet bug isn't effective on ghosts too, so that's not that helpful either.
Something I want to see is an electric/fighting Pokémon. There exist many fire/fighting ones, but no electric/fighting.
 
Last edited:
31.

lycan that last line sounded like a doge meme But I still want a Bug/Normal type....

Whaddya mean you guys don't want another Fire/Fighting type?
[PokeCommunity.com] Watch out for Ghosts! (Read the First Post!)
 
32

Because with the spam of three starters with the typing across three consecutive generations, people got sick of it and say it's not original anymore.
 
33

I don't have a problem with the starters having only one type, like in the second gen. However, I think it's either all of them or none of them that should gain a second type, not like Gens I/III/V.
 
35.

It was a joke......
But I agree that I don't care what their second typings are or if they only have one type, I generally choose starters based on looks anyways.....
 
36
I pretty much base most of my teams based on design, starter included. I also generally try to make them balanced type-wise for normal play-throughs. I don't really care whether staters get or don't get a secondary type; they can add a bit of interestingness to the Pokemon but being a single type isn't really any worse. I do agree that three Fire/Fighting starters was a bit much though.
 
37.
Gulpin said:
I pretty much base most of my teams based on design, starter included. I also generally try to make them balanced type-wise for normal play-throughs. I don't really care whether staters get or don't get a secondary type; they can add a bit of interestingness to the Pokemon but being a single type isn't really any worse. I do agree that three Fire/Fighting starters was a bit much though.
Click to expand...

Basically what I was trying to say. :3 Aggreement!!~ *high five*
 
39

Yeah, because starter Pokémon are relatively strong compared to the available Pokémon on the first few routes and they start at a decent level, which means they're pretty strong and often remain one of the highest levelled Pokémon in my team. I don't think I've ever played without my starter outside of challenges.
 
40

I always use my starter pokemon because I'm too lazy to replace them, and I'm not going to invest time into getting them to the final stage only to switch out for something "statistically better".
 
42.

If I do a challenge, then I try to use a tool for changing the starters to something I need. (Emulators) In normal playthroughs I ALWAYS use my starter, like you guys said it's not the same without a member you trained for so long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top